"Generate" the Future of Work through AI: Empirical Evidence from Online Labor Markets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model (LLM)-based generative AI systems are general-purpose tools capable of augmenting or even automating a wide range of job functions, positioning them to reshape labor market dynamics. However, predicting their precise impact a priori is challenging, given AI's simultaneous effects on both demand and supply, as well as the strategic responses of market participants. Leveraging an extensive dataset from a leading online labor platform, we document a pronounced displacement effect and an overall contraction in submarkets where required skills closely align with core LLM functionalities. Although demand and supply both decline, the reduction in supply is comparatively smaller, thereby intensifying competition among freelancers. Notably, further analysis shows that this heightened competition is especially pronounced in programming-intensive submarkets. This pattern is attributed to skill-transition effects: by lowering the human-capital barrier to programming, ChatGPT enables incumbent freelancers to enter programming tasks. Moreover, these transitions are not homogeneous, with high-skilled freelancers contributing disproportionately to the shift. Our findings illuminate the multifaceted impacts of general-purpose AI on labor markets, highlighting not only the displacement of certain occupations but also the inducement of skill transitions within the labor supply. These insights offer practical implications for policymakers, platform operators, and workers.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2023.
Builds on
8 of 54 references.
References · 8
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 398
- 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 174
- 2023The Future of ChatGPT-enabled Labor Market: A Preliminary Study in Chinacited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Position: Key Claims in LLM Research Have a Long Tail of Footnotescited by 20
- 2024Generative AI and Copyright: A Dynamic Perspectivecited by 7
- 2024A Scoping Review of ChatGPT Research in Accounting and Financecited by 6
- 2024Crafting Knowledge: Exploring the Creative Mechanisms of Chat-Based Search Enginescited by 5
- 2023AI and Jobs: Has the Inflection Point Arrived? Evidence from an Online Labor Platformcited by 1
- 2024Generative AI Impact on Labor Market: Analyzing ChatGPT's Demand in Job Advertisementscited by 0
- 2025When AI Agents Compete for Jobs: Strategic Capabilities and Economic Dynamics of AI Labour Marketscited by 0
- 2025When AI Agents Compete for Jobs: Strategic Capabilities and Economic Dynamics of AI Labour Markets4 Dec 2025
- 2024Generative AI Impact on Labor Market: Analyzing ChatGPT's Demand in Job Advertisements9 Dec 2024
- 2024A Scoping Review of ChatGPT Research in Accounting and Finance7 Dec 2024
- 2024Crafting Knowledge: Exploring the Creative Mechanisms of Chat-Based Search Engines29 Feb 2024
- 2024Generative AI and Copyright: A Dynamic Perspective27 Feb 2024
- 2023AI and Jobs: Has the Inflection Point Arrived? Evidence from an Online Labor Platform7 Dec 2023
- 2023Position: Key Claims in LLM Research Have a Long Tail of Footnotes14 Aug 2023