mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Inductive Biases of Demographic Parity-based Fair Learning Algorithms

arXiv 2402.18129 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.ITcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fair supervised learning algorithms assigning labels with little dependence on a sensitive attribute have attracted great attention in the machine learning community. While the demographic parity (DP) notion has been frequently used to measure a model's fairness in training fair classifiers, several studies in the literature suggest potential impacts of enforcing DP in fair learning algorithms. In this work, we analytically study the effect of standard DP-based regularization methods on the conditional distribution of the predicted label given the sensitive attribute. Our analysis shows that an imbalanced training dataset with a non-uniform distribution of the sensitive attribute could lead to a classification rule biased toward the sensitive attribute outcome holding the majority of training data. To control such inductive biases in DP-based fair learning, we propose a sensitive attribute-based distributionally robust optimization (SA-DRO) method improving robustness against the marginal distribution of the sensitive attribute. Finally, we present several numerical results on the application of DP-based learning methods to standard centralized and distributed learning problems. The empirical findings support our theoretical results on the inductive biases in DP-based fair learning algorithms and the debiasing effects of the proposed SA-DRO method.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2024.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  5. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  6. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  7. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  8. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  9. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  10. 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
  11. 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
  12. 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
7 more
  1. 2020FR-Train: A Mutual Information-Based Approach to Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 52
  2. 2019Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matchingcited by 36
  3. 2019R'enyi Fair Inferencecited by 33
  4. 2021A Stochastic Optimization Framework for Fair Risk Minimizationcited by 26
  5. 2021Fairness-aware Class Imbalanced Learningcited by 19
  6. 2020Learning Unbiased Representations via R'enyi Minimizationcited by 18
  7. 2022FIFA: Making Fairness More Generalizable in Classifiers Trained on Imbalanced Datacited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.