mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Outlier-Detection for Reactive Machine Learned Potential Energy Surfaces

arXiv 2402.17686 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2024physics.chem-ph cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) to detect samples with large expected errors (outliers) is applied to reactive molecular potential energy surfaces (PESs). Three methods - Ensembles, Deep Evidential Regression (DER), and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) - were applied to the H-transfer reaction between it syn-Criegee and vinyl hydroxyperoxide. The results indicate that ensemble models provide the best results for detecting outliers, followed by GMM. For example, from a pool of 1000 structures with the largest uncertainty, the detection quality for outliers is ~ 90 % and ~ 50 %, respectively, if 25 or 1000 structures with large errors are sought. On the contrary, the limitations of the statistical assumptions of DER greatly impacted its prediction capabilities. Finally, a structure-based indicator was found to be correlated with large average error, which may help to rapidly classify new structures into those that provide an advantage for refining the neural network.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.

Builds on

6 of 40 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  2. 2020Machine Learning Force Fieldscited by 207
  3. 2022The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 40
  4. 2023Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensemblescited by 30
  5. 2022Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 22
  6. 2021Improving evidential deep learning via multi-task learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.