Successfully Guiding Humans with Imperfect Instructions by Highlighting Potential Errors and Suggesting Corrections
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models will inevitably err in situations with which they are unfamiliar. However, by effectively communicating uncertainties, they can still guide humans toward making sound decisions in those contexts. We demonstrate this idea by developing HEAR, a system that can successfully guide humans in simulated residential environments despite generating potentially inaccurate instructions. Diverging from systems that provide users with only the instructions they generate, HEAR warns users of potential errors in its instructions and suggests corrections. This rich uncertainty information effectively prevents misguidance and reduces the search space for users. Evaluation with 80 users shows that HEAR achieves a 13% increase in success rate and a 29% reduction in final location error distance compared to only presenting instructions to users. Interestingly, we find that offering users possibilities to explore, HEAR motivates them to make more attempts at the task, ultimately leading to a higher success rate. To our best knowledge, this work is the first to show the practical benefits of uncertainty communication in a long-horizon sequential decision-making problem.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2024.
Builds on
32 of 55 references.
References · 32
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,016
- 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 663
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 580
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 498
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 494
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2018Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 337
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 244
- 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
20 more
- 2020Improving Vision-and-Language Navigation with Image-Text Pairs from the Webcited by 177
- 2020Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generationcited by 152
- 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 137
- 2021Airbert: In-domain Pretraining for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 129
- 2020On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translationcited by 127
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 86
- 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 76
- 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
- 2019Domain Robustness in Neural Machine Translationcited by 65
- 2021Less is More: Generating Grounded Navigation Instructions from Landmarkscited by 62
- 2022A New Path: Scaling Vision-and-Language Navigation with Synthetic Instructions and Imitation Learningcited by 60
- 2020Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 59
- 2017Unified Pragmatic Models for Generating and Following Instructionscited by 55
- 2023Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspectioncited by 44
- 2021Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generationcited by 41
- 2023Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 28
- 2022Define, Evaluate, and Improve Task-Oriented Cognitive Capabilities for Instruction Generation Modelscited by 7
- 2023Hallucination Detection for Grounded Instruction Generationcited by 7
- 2019Why Authors Don't Visualize Uncertaintycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.