mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Concurrent Learning of Policy and Unknown Safety Constraints in Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2402.15893 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2024eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has revolutionized decision-making across a wide range of domains over the past few decades. Yet, deploying RL policies in real-world scenarios presents the crucial challenge of ensuring safety. Traditional safe RL approaches have predominantly focused on incorporating predefined safety constraints into the policy learning process. However, this reliance on predefined safety constraints poses limitations in dynamic and unpredictable real-world settings where such constraints may not be available or sufficiently adaptable. Bridging this gap, we propose a novel approach that concurrently learns a safe RL control policy and identifies the unknown safety constraint parameters of a given environment. Initializing with a parametric signal temporal logic (pSTL) safety specification and a small initial labeled dataset, we frame the problem as a bilevel optimization task, intricately integrating constrained policy optimization, using a Lagrangian-variant of the twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3) algorithm, with Bayesian optimization for optimizing parameters for the given pSTL safety specification. Through experimentation in comprehensive case studies, we validate the efficacy of this approach across varying forms of environmental constraints, consistently yielding safe RL policies with high returns. Furthermore, our findings indicate successful learning of STL safety constraint parameters, exhibiting a high degree of conformity with true environmental safety constraints. The performance of our model closely mirrors that of an ideal scenario that possesses complete prior knowledge of safety constraints, demonstrating its proficiency in accurately identifying environmental safety constraints and learning safe policies that adhere to those constraints.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2024.

Builds on

31 of 64 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  2. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  3. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  4. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  5. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  6. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
  7. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
  8. 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
  9. 2020Projection-Based Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 195
  10. 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
  11. 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
  12. 2023Safety-Gymnasium: A Unified Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarkcited by 135
19 more
  1. 2017A Review on Bilevel Optimization: From Classical to Evolutionary Approaches and Applicationscited by 126
  2. 2016Reinforcement Learning With Temporal Logic Rewardscited by 114
  3. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 109
  4. 2021Recent Advances in Reinforcement Learning in Financecited by 102
  5. 2023OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Researchcited by 76
  6. 2016Safe Exploration in Finite Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processescited by 72
  7. 2019Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design with Mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Variablescited by 64
  8. 2020Backpropagation through Signal Temporal Logic Specifications: Infusing Logical Structure into Gradient-Based Methodscited by 51
  9. 2020Upper Confidence Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for CMDP with Adversarial Losscited by 46
  10. 2020Cautious Reinforcement Learning with Logical Constraintscited by 44
  11. 2021Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time Violationscited by 36
  12. 2021Joint Synthesis of Safety Certificate and Safe Control Policy using Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  13. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning with Enhanced Safety for Autonomous Highway Drivingcited by 21
  14. 2022A Survey on Reinforcement Learning in Aviation Applicationscited by 19
  15. 2017A Robust Genetic Algorithm for Learning Temporal Specifications from Datacited by 11
  16. 2022Deep reinforcement learning under signal temporal logic constraints using Lagrangian relaxationcited by 8
  17. 2016Logic-based Clustering and Learning for Time-Series Datacited by 7
  18. 2019Waypoint Optimization Using Bayesian Optimization: A Case Study in Airborne Wind Energy Systemscited by 6
  19. 2019Economically Efficient Combined Plant and Controller Design Using Batch Bayesian Optimization: Mathematical Framework and Airborne Wind Energy Case Studycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.