Ranking Entities along Conceptual Space Dimensions with LLMs: An Analysis of Fine-Tuning Strategies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conceptual spaces represent entities in terms of their primitive semantic features. Such representations are highly valuable but they are notoriously difficult to learn, especially when it comes to modelling perceptual and subjective features. Distilling conceptual spaces from Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently emerged as a promising strategy, but existing work has been limited to probing pre-trained LLMs using relatively simple zero-shot strategies. We focus in particular on the task of ranking entities according to a given conceptual space dimension. Unfortunately, we cannot directly fine-tune LLMs on this task, because ground truth rankings for conceptual space dimensions are rare. We therefore use more readily available features as training data and analyse whether the ranking capabilities of the resulting models transfer to perceptual and subjective features. We find that this is indeed the case, to some extent, but having at least some perceptual and subjective features in the training data seems essential for achieving the best results.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.
Builds on
26 of 63 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
- 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 952
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2019COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 450
- 2022Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5)cited by 396
- 2019KG-BERT: BERT for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 323
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2021Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Modelscited by 270
- 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 200
- 2022Linearly Mapping from Image to Text Spacecited by 139
14 more
- 2021Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Colorcited by 118
- 2023Crawling the Internal Knowledge-Base of Language Modelscited by 85
- 2021BERTMap: A BERT-based Ontology Alignment Systemcited by 45
- 2022Things not Written in Text: Exploring Spatial Commonsense from Visual Signalscited by 41
- 2022A Decade of Knowledge Graphs in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 40
- 2024The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Easy Training Data for Hard Taskscited by 40
- 2021The World of an Octopus: How Reporting Bias Influences a Language Model's Perception of Colorcited by 32
- 2022FolkScope: Intention Knowledge Graph Construction for E-commerce Commonsense Discoverycited by 23
- 2023Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts?cited by 19
- 2022Unified Semantic Typing with Meaningful Label Inferencecited by 18
- 2022Sparse Pairwise Re-ranking with Pre-trained Transformerscited by 8
- 2022Do ever larger octopi still amplify reporting biases? Evidence from judgments of typical colourcited by 5
- 2023Cabbage Sweeter than Cake? Analysing the Potential of Large Language Models for Learning Conceptual Spacescited by 3
- 2023A RelEntLess Benchmark for Modelling Graded Relations between Named Entitiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.