mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generative Product Recommendations for Implicit Superlative Queries

arXiv 2504.18748 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2025cs.IR cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Recommender Systems, users often seek the best products through indirect, vague, or under-specified queries, such as "best shoes for trail running". Such queries, also referred to as implicit superlative queries, pose a significant challenge for standard retrieval and ranking systems as they lack an explicit mention of attributes and require identifying and reasoning over complex factors. We investigate how Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate implicit attributes for ranking as well as reason over them to improve product recommendations for such queries. As a first step, we propose a novel four-point schema for annotating the best product candidates for superlative queries called SUPERB, paired with LLM-based product annotations. We then empirically evaluate several existing retrieval and ranking approaches on our new dataset, providing insights and discussing their integration into real-world e-commerce production systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2025.

Builds on

30 of 50 references.

References · 30

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  4. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  5. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
  6. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  7. 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 307
  8. 2023Fine-Tuning LLaMA for Multi-Stage Text Retrievalcited by 272
  9. 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 201
  10. 2023Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Modelscited by 159
  11. 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 155
  12. 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
18 more
  1. 2023Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Predictioncited by 116
  2. 2023Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labelscited by 86
  3. 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 85
  4. 2022Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Searchcited by 65
  5. 2023LlamaRec: Two-Stage Recommendation using Large Language Models for Rankingcited by 53
  6. 2023One-Shot Labeling for Automatic Relevance Estimationcited by 31
  7. 2020Declarative Experimentation in Information Retrieval using PyTerriercited by 30
  8. 2021MS MARCO: Benchmarking Ranking Models in the Large-Data Regimecited by 28
  9. 2024GenQREnsemble: Zero-Shot LLM Ensemble Prompting for Generative Query Reformulationcited by 23
  10. 2023Deliberate then Generate: Enhanced Prompting Framework for Text Generationcited by 13
  11. 2025Wizard of Shopping: Target-Oriented E-commerce Dialogue Generation with Decision Tree Branchingcited by 10
  12. 2024Consolidating Ranking and Relevance Predictions of Large Language Models through Post-Processingcited by 9
  13. 2024Question Suggestion for Conversational Shopping Assistants Using Product Metadatacited by 8
  14. 2024Large Language Models for Relevance Judgment in Product Searchcited by 8
  15. 2024ConQRet: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Argumentation with LLM Judgescited by 5
  16. 2023ZeQR: Zero-shot Query Reformulation for Conversational Searchcited by 4
  17. 2024Bridging the Gap Between Information Seeking and Product Search Systems: Q&A Recommendation for E-commercecited by 4
  18. 2024Ranking Entities along Conceptual Space Dimensions with LLMs: An Analysis of Fine-Tuning Strategiescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.