How Do Large Language Models Learn Concepts During Continual Pre-Training?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Human beings primarily understand the world through concepts (e.g., dog), abstract mental representations that structure perception, reasoning, and learning. However, how large language models (LLMs) acquire, retain, and forget such concepts during continual pretraining remains poorly understood. In this work, we study how individual concepts are acquired and forgotten, as well as how multiple concepts interact through interference and synergy. We link these behavioral dynamics to LLMs' internal concept circuits, computational subgraphs associated with specific concepts, and incorporate graph metrics to characterize circuit topology. Our analysis reveals: (1) LLMs concept circuits provide a non-trivial, consistent signal of concept learning and forgetting; (2) concept circuits exhibit a stage-wise temporal pattern during continual pretraining, with an early increase followed by gradual decrease and stabilization; (3) concepts with larger learning gains tend to exhibit greater forgetting under subsequent training; (4) semantically similar concepts induce stronger interference than weakly related ones; (5) conceptual knowledge differs in their transferability, with some significantly facilitating the learning of others. Together, our findings provide a circuit-level view of concept learning dynamics and motivate concept-aware training strategies, such as Circuit-aware Experience Replay, which uses circuit topology to prioritize concepts vulnerable to forgetting.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2026.
Builds on
24 of 54 references.
References · 24
- 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
- 2018Selective Experience Replay for Lifelong Learningcited by 239
- 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 191
- 2024Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanismscited by 144
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
- 2023Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined taskscited by 110
- 2024Knowledge Circuits in Pretrained Transformerscited by 60
- 2024LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scalecited by 60
- 2024The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structurecited by 52
- 2024Knowledge Mechanisms in Large Language Models: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 50
- 2024AntiLeakBench: Preventing Data Contamination by Automatically Constructing Benchmarks with Updated Real-World Knowledgecited by 42
12 more
- 2025How do language models learn facts? Dynamics, curricula and hallucinationscited by 33
- 2023Language Model Analysis for Ontology Subsumption Inferencecited by 25
- 2025How Do LLMs Acquire New Knowledge? A Knowledge Circuits Perspective on Continual Pre-Trainingcited by 22
- 2022COPEN: Probing Conceptual Knowledge in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 21
- 2025The Geometry of Reasoning: Flowing Logics in Representation Spacecited by 21
- 2022Unpacking Large Language Models with Conceptual Consistencycited by 18
- 2024Tracking the Feature Dynamics in LLM Training: A Mechanistic Studycited by 15
- 2022Do language models have coherent mental models of everyday things?cited by 13
- 2024Extractive Structures Learned in Pretraining Enable Generalization on Finetuned Factscited by 13
- 2024On the Tip of the Tongue: Analyzing Conceptual Representation in Large Language Models with Reverse-Dictionary Probecited by 6
- 2024Reasoning about concepts with LLMs: Inconsistencies aboundcited by 6
- 2024Bridging Linguistic Structure and Mechanistic Interpretability for Conceptual Interpretation in Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.