mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

COPR: Continual Human Preference Learning via Optimal Policy Regularization

arXiv 2402.14228 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is commonly utilized to improve the alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences. Given the evolving nature of human preferences, continual alignment becomes more crucial and practical in comparison to traditional static alignment. Nevertheless, making RLHF compatible with Continual Learning (CL) is challenging due to its complex process. Meanwhile, directly learning new human preferences may lead to Catastrophic Forgetting (CF) of historical preferences, resulting in helpless or harmful outputs. To overcome these challenges, we propose the Continual Optimal Policy Regularization (COPR) method, which draws inspiration from the optimal policy theory. COPR utilizes a sampling distribution as a demonstration and regularization constraints for CL. It adopts the Lagrangian Duality (LD) method to dynamically regularize the current policy based on the historically optimal policy, which prevents CF and avoids over-emphasizing unbalanced objectives. We also provide formal proof for the learnability of COPR. The experimental results show that COPR outperforms strong CL baselines on our proposed benchmark, in terms of reward-based, GPT-4 evaluations and human assessment. Furthermore, we validate the robustness of COPR under various CL settings, including different backbones, replay memory sizes, and learning orders.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 33 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

33 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  2. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment30 Jun
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 30

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  9. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  10. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  11. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  12. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
18 more
  1. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  2. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,094
  3. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  4. 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,044
  5. 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 895
  6. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  7. 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 734
  8. 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 672
  9. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
  10. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  11. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  12. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 244
  13. 2018Task-Free Continual Learningcited by 219
  14. 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
  15. 2023Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactionscited by 77
  16. 2023Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignmentcited by 57
  17. 2021Self-Supervised Training Enhances Online Continual Learningcited by 53
  18. 2023Second Thoughts are Best: Learning to Re-Align With Human Values from Text Editscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023COPR: Continual Learning Human Preference through Optimal Policy Regularization
  2. 2024On the Algorithmic Bias of Aligning Large Language Models with RLHF: Preference Collapse and Matching Regularization
  3. 2024Hybrid Preference Optimization for Alignment: Provably Faster Convergence Rates by Combining Offline Preferences with Online Exploration
  4. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint
  5. 2026Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Statistical Perspective
  6. 2023Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration
  7. 2024Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment
  8. 2024Mixed Preference Optimization: Reinforcement Learning with Data Selection and Better Reference Model