Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with DOPE
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Covariate adjustment is a ubiquitous method used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data. Assuming a known graphical structure of the data generating model, recent results give graphical criteria for optimal adjustment, which enables efficient estimation of the ATE. However, graphical approaches are challenging for high-dimensional and complex data, and it is not straightforward to specify a meaningful graphical model of non-Euclidean data such as texts. We propose a new framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates, and we show that the information that is minimally sufficient for prediction of the outcome given the treatment is also most efficient for adjustment. Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the ATE, and we provide asymptotic results for DOPE under general conditions. Compared to the augmented inverse propensity weighted (AIPW) estimator, DOPE can retain its efficiency even when the covariates are highly predictive of treatment. We illustrate this with a single-index model, and with an implementation of DOPE based on neural networks, we demonstrate its performance on simulated and real data. Our results show that DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.
Builds on
13 of 48 references.
References · 13
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
- 2020Kaggle forecasting competitions: An overlooked learning opportunitycited by 55
- 2019A unifying approach for doubly-robust ℓ1 regularized estimation of causal contrastscited by 15
- 2020Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimatorscited by 10
- 2022Nonparametric Conditional Local Independence Testingcited by 7
- 2023ReLU Neural Networks with Linear Layers are Biased Towards Single- and Multi-Index Modelscited by 7
- 2020High-Dimensional Feature Selection for Sample Efficient Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 6
- 2022Confounder Selection: Objectives and Approachescited by 4
- 2019A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effectcited by 3
- 2017Scalable Collaborative Targeted Learning for High-Dimensional Datacited by 2
- 2023Boosted Control Functions: Distribution generalization and invariance in confounded modelscited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025What is causal about causal models and representations?cited by 6
- 2025Orthogonal Representation Learning for Estimating Causal Quantitiescited by 4
- 2025Adjustment for Confounding using Pre-Trained Representationscited by 3
- 2026Unveiling the Structure of Do-Calculus Reasoning via Derivation Graphscited by 1
- 2026Outcome-adapted Automatic Debiased Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026Outcome-adapted Automatic Debiased Machine Learning3 Jul 2026
- 2026Unveiling the Structure of Do-Calculus Reasoning via Derivation Graphs2 Jun 2026
- 2025Adjustment for Confounding using Pre-Trained Representations17 Jun 2025
- 2025Orthogonal Representation Learning for Estimating Causal Quantities6 Feb 2025
- 2025What is causal about causal models and representations?31 Jan 2025