Are LLMs Rational Investors? A Study on Detecting and Reducing the Financial Bias in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in financial analysis for interpreting complex market data and trends. However, their use is challenged by intrinsic biases (e.g., risk-preference bias) and a superficial understanding of market intricacies, necessitating a thorough assessment of their financial insight. To address these issues, we introduce Financial Bias Indicators (FBI), a framework with components like Bias Unveiler, Bias Detective, Bias Tracker, and Bias Antidote to identify, detect, analyze, and eliminate irrational biases in LLMs. By combining behavioral finance principles with bias examination, we evaluate 23 leading LLMs and propose a de-biasing method based on financial causal knowledge. Results show varying degrees of financial irrationality among models, influenced by their design and training. Models trained specifically on financial datasets may exhibit more irrationality, and even larger financial language models (FinLLMs) can show more bias than smaller, general models. We utilize four prompt-based methods incorporating causal debiasing, effectively reducing financial biases in these models. This work enhances the understanding of LLMs' bias in financial applications, laying the foundation for developing more reliable and rational financial analysis tools.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.
Builds on
14 of 25 references.
References · 14
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2022BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedurecited by 779
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
- 2023System 2 Attention (is something you might need too)cited by 85
- 2023The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPTcited by 66
- 2023From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuningcited by 56
- 2023OpinionGPT: Modelling Explicit Biases in Instruction-Tuned LLMscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directionscited by 27
- 2025Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysiscited by 16
- 2024Political Actor Agent: Simulating Legislative System for Roll Call Votes Prediction with Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Uncovering Representation Bias for Investment Decisions in Open-Source Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2024SilverSight: A Multi-Task Chinese Financial Large Language Model Based on Adaptive Semantic Space Learningcited by 1
- 2025Won: Establishing Best Practices for Korean Financial NLPcited by 0
- 2025Uncovering Representation Bias for Investment Decisions in Open-Source Large Language Models7 Oct 2025
- 2025Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis28 Jul 2025
- 2025Won: Establishing Best Practices for Korean Financial NLP23 Mar 2025
- 2024Political Actor Agent: Simulating Legislative System for Roll Call Votes Prediction with Large Language Models10 Dec 2024
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods7 Dec 2024
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directions24 Sep 2024
- 2024SilverSight: A Multi-Task Chinese Financial Large Language Model Based on Adaptive Semantic Space Learning7 Apr 2024