mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of Using Sigmoid Loss for Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2402.12613 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contrastive learning has emerged as a prominent branch of self-supervised learning for several years. Especially, CLIP, which applies contrastive learning to large sets of captioned images, has garnered significant attention. Recently, SigLIP, a variant of CLIP, has been proposed, which uses the sigmoid loss instead of the standard InfoNCE loss. SigLIP achieves the performance comparable to CLIP in a more efficient manner by eliminating the need for a global view. However, theoretical understanding of using the sigmoid loss in contrastive learning is underexplored. In this paper, we provide a theoretical analysis of using the sigmoid loss in contrastive learning, in the perspective of the geometric structure of learned embeddings. First, we propose the double-Constant Embedding Model (CCEM), a framework for parameterizing various well-known embedding structures by a single variable. Interestingly, the proposed CCEM is proven to contain the optimal embedding with respect to the sigmoid loss. Second, we mathematically analyze the optimal embedding minimizing the sigmoid loss for contrastive learning. The optimal embedding ranges from simplex equiangular-tight-frame to antipodal structure, depending on the temperature parameter used in the sigmoid loss. Third, our experimental results on synthetic datasets coincide with the theoretical results on the optimal embedding structures.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.

Builds on

36 of 52 references.

References · 36

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  7. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  8. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  9. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  10. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  11. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  12. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
24 more
  1. 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
  2. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  3. 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 693
  4. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  5. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  6. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  7. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  8. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  9. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  10. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
  11. 2020DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representationscited by 249
  12. 2019Scaling and Benchmarking Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 201
  13. 2020CLEAR: Contrastive Learning for Sentence Representationcited by 186
  14. 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 129
  15. 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
  16. 2021Towards the Generalization of Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 99
  17. 2022Understanding Contrastive Learning Requires Incorporating Inductive Biasescited by 96
  18. 2022How Does SimSiam Avoid Collapse Without Negative Samples? A Unified Understanding with Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 65
  19. 2021Dissecting Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 64
  20. 2022Dual Temperature Helps Contrastive Learning Without Many Negative Samples: Towards Understanding and Simplifying MoCocited by 52
  21. 2023Temperature Schedules for Self-Supervised Contrastive Methods on Long-Tail Datacited by 44
  22. 2022Do More Negative Samples Necessarily Hurt in Contrastive Learning?cited by 39
  23. 2021Temperature as Uncertainty in Contrastive Learningcited by 25
  24. 2023Mini-Batch Optimization of Contrastive Losscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.