Analysis of Using Sigmoid Loss for Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrastive learning has emerged as a prominent branch of self-supervised learning for several years. Especially, CLIP, which applies contrastive learning to large sets of captioned images, has garnered significant attention. Recently, SigLIP, a variant of CLIP, has been proposed, which uses the sigmoid loss instead of the standard InfoNCE loss. SigLIP achieves the performance comparable to CLIP in a more efficient manner by eliminating the need for a global view. However, theoretical understanding of using the sigmoid loss in contrastive learning is underexplored. In this paper, we provide a theoretical analysis of using the sigmoid loss in contrastive learning, in the perspective of the geometric structure of learned embeddings. First, we propose the double-Constant Embedding Model (CCEM), a framework for parameterizing various well-known embedding structures by a single variable. Interestingly, the proposed CCEM is proven to contain the optimal embedding with respect to the sigmoid loss. Second, we mathematically analyze the optimal embedding minimizing the sigmoid loss for contrastive learning. The optimal embedding ranges from simplex equiangular-tight-frame to antipodal structure, depending on the temperature parameter used in the sigmoid loss. Third, our experimental results on synthetic datasets coincide with the theoretical results on the optimal embedding structures.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.
Builds on
36 of 52 references.
References · 36
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
24 more
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
- 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
- 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 693
- 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
- 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
- 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
- 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 397
- 2020DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representationscited by 249
- 2019Scaling and Benchmarking Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 201
- 2020CLEAR: Contrastive Learning for Sentence Representationcited by 186
- 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 129
- 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
- 2021Towards the Generalization of Contrastive Self-Supervised Learningcited by 99
- 2022Understanding Contrastive Learning Requires Incorporating Inductive Biasescited by 96
- 2022How Does SimSiam Avoid Collapse Without Negative Samples? A Unified Understanding with Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 65
- 2021Dissecting Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 64
- 2022Dual Temperature Helps Contrastive Learning Without Many Negative Samples: Towards Understanding and Simplifying MoCocited by 52
- 2023Temperature Schedules for Self-Supervised Contrastive Methods on Long-Tail Datacited by 44
- 2022Do More Negative Samples Necessarily Hurt in Contrastive Learning?cited by 39
- 2021Temperature as Uncertainty in Contrastive Learningcited by 25
- 2023Mini-Batch Optimization of Contrastive Losscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Enhancing Conceptual Understanding in Multimodal Contrastive Learning through Hard Negative Samplescited by 6
- 2025Global Minimizers of Sigmoid Contrastive Losscited by 4
- 2024A Cognac Shot To Forget Bad Memories: Corrective Unlearning for Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025A Theoretical Framework for Preventing Class Collapse in Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2
- 2025On the Similarities of Embeddings in Contrastive Learningcited by 2
- 2026Multi-Marginal Inverse Optimal Transport for Contrastive Learning Via Explicit Anchor-Positive-Negative Couplingcited by 0
- 2026Multi-Marginal Inverse Optimal Transport for Contrastive Learning Via Explicit Anchor-Positive-Negative Coupling27 Sep 2026
- 2025Global Minimizers of Sigmoid Contrastive Loss23 Sep 2025
- 2025On the Similarities of Embeddings in Contrastive Learning11 Jun 2025
- 2025A Theoretical Framework for Preventing Class Collapse in Supervised Contrastive Learning11 Mar 2025
- 2024A Cognac Shot To Forget Bad Memories: Corrective Unlearning for Graph Neural Networks1 Dec 2024
- 2024Enhancing Conceptual Understanding in Multimodal Contrastive Learning through Hard Negative Samples5 Mar 2024