Assessing biomedical knowledge robustness in large language models by query-efficient sampling attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing depth of parametric domain knowledge in large language models (LLMs) is fueling their rapid deployment in real-world applications. Understanding model vulnerabilities in high-stakes and knowledge-intensive tasks is essential for quantifying the trustworthiness of model predictions and regulating their use. The recent discovery of named entities as adversarial examples (i.e. adversarial entities) in natural language processing tasks raises questions about their potential impact on the knowledge robustness of pre-trained and finetuned LLMs in high-stakes and specialized domains. We examined the use of type-consistent entity substitution as a template for collecting adversarial entities for billion-parameter LLMs with biomedical knowledge. To this end, we developed an embedding-space attack based on powerscaled distance-weighted sampling to assess the robustness of their biomedical knowledge with a low query budget and controllable coverage. Our method has favorable query efficiency and scaling over alternative approaches based on random sampling and blackbox gradient-guided search, which we demonstrated for adversarial distractor generation in biomedical question answering. Subsequent failure mode analysis uncovered two regimes of adversarial entities on the attack surface with distinct characteristics and we showed that entity substitution attacks can manipulate token-wise Shapley value explanations, which become deceptive in this setting. Our approach complements standard evaluations for high-capacity models and the results highlight the brittleness of domain knowledge in LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.
Builds on
64 of 90 references.
References · 64
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
- 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 525
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
38 more
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 454
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 382
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 361
- 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 349
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 319
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
- 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 292
- 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
- 2023MedAlpaca -- An Open-Source Collection of Medical Conversational AI Models and Training Datacited by 282
- 2022Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliablecited by 258
- 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
- 2022The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Lawscited by 247
- 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
- 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 199
- 2013Optimal rates for zero-order convex optimization: the power of two function evaluationscited by 190
- 2023Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attackscited by 189
- 2016Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraintscited by 138
- 2018Query-Efficient Hard-label Black-box Attack:An Optimization-based Approachcited by 130
- 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 125
- 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 114
- 2023Do We Still Need Clinical Language Models?cited by 97
- 2021Pre-trained Language Models in Biomedical Domain: A Systematic Surveycited by 87
- 2020Reevaluating Adversarial Examples in Natural Languagecited by 83
- 2021Can Language Models be Biomedical Knowledge Bases?cited by 83
- 2019MedMentions: A Large Biomedical Corpus Annotated with UMLS Conceptscited by 79
- 2023AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humanscited by 75
- 2021Fine-Tuning Large Neural Language Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 57
- 2020Machine Knowledge: Creation and Curation of Comprehensive Knowledge Basescited by 55
- 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 55
- 2020Frequency-Guided Word Substitutions for Detecting Textual Adversarial Examplescited by 54
- 2020CODER: Knowledge infused cross-lingual medical term embedding for term normalizationcited by 53
- 2020What do Models Learn from Question Answering Datasets?cited by 45
- 2018Greedy Attack and Gumbel Attack: Generating Adversarial Examples for Discrete Datacited by 37
- 2018A Comparison of Word Embeddings for the Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 29
50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.