Theoretical Understanding of Learning from Adversarial Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is not fully understood why adversarial examples can deceive neural networks and transfer between different networks. To elucidate this, several studies have hypothesized that adversarial perturbations, while appearing as noises, contain class features. This is supported by empirical evidence showing that networks trained on mislabeled adversarial examples can still generalize well to correctly labeled test samples. However, a theoretical understanding of how perturbations include class features and contribute to generalization is limited. In this study, we provide a theoretical framework for understanding learning from perturbations using a one-hidden-layer network trained on mutually orthogonal samples. Our results highlight that various adversarial perturbations, even perturbations of a few pixels, contain sufficient class features for generalization. Moreover, we reveal that the decision boundary when learning from perturbations matches that from standard samples except for specific regions under mild conditions. The code is available at https://github.com/s-kumano/learning-from-adversarial-perturbations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.
Builds on
29 of 39 references.
References · 29
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
- 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
17 more
- 2018Is Robustness the Cost of Accuracy? -- A Comprehensive Study on the Robustness of 18 Deep Image Classification Modelscited by 135
- 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
- 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
- 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
- 2019Interpreting Adversarially Trained Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 75
- 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
- 2022Implicit Bias in Leaky ReLU Networks Trained on High-Dimensional Datacited by 46
- 2019Are Perceptually-Aligned Gradients a General Property of Robust Classifiers?cited by 42
- 2021Adversarial Training Helps Transfer Learning via Better Representationscited by 36
- 2020Batch Normalization Increases Adversarial Vulnerability and Decreases Adversarial Transferability: A Non-Robust Feature Perspectivecited by 35
- 2021A Little Robustness Goes a Long Way: Leveraging Robust Features for Targeted Transfer Attackscited by 33
- 2022Distilling Robust and Non-Robust Features in Adversarial Examples by Information Bottleneckcited by 30
- 2022What Can the Neural Tangent Kernel Tell Us About Adversarial Robustness?cited by 21
- 2021Towards Understanding Learning in Neural Networks with Linear Teacherscited by 19
- 2020On the Benefits of Models with Perceptually-Aligned Gradientscited by 13
- 2022Can Adversarial Training Be Manipulated By Non-Robust Features?cited by 12
- 2021Adversarial Perturbations Are Not So Weird: Entanglement of Robust and Non-Robust Features in Neural Network Classifierscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.