mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Probabilistic Models with Distributional Values

arXiv 2402.09947 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A large branch of explainable machine learning is grounded in cooperative game theory. However, research indicates that game-theoretic explanations may mislead or be hard to interpret. We argue that often there is a critical mismatch between what one wishes to explain (e.g. the output of a classifier) and what current methods such as SHAP explain (e.g. the scalar probability of a class). This paper addresses such gap for probabilistic models by generalising cooperative games and value operators. We introduce the distributional values, random variables that track changes in the model output (e.g. flipping of the predicted class) and derive their analytic expressions for games with Gaussian, Bernoulli and Categorical payoffs. We further establish several characterising properties, and show that our framework provides fine-grained and insightful explanations with case studies on vision and language models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.

Builds on

42 of 72 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  8. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  9. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  10. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  11. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  12. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
30 more
  1. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
  2. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  3. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  4. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  5. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  6. 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 281
  7. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
  8. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  9. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  10. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
  11. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
  12. 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 153
  13. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
  14. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  15. 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
  16. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  17. 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
  18. 2021Sampling Permutations for Shapley Value Estimationcited by 101
  19. 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
  20. 2020Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible Neuronscited by 98
  21. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  22. 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 97
  23. 2017Structured Attention Networkscited by 95
  24. 2020Shapley explainability on the data manifoldcited by 88
  25. 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 79
  26. 2021Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretabilitycited by 75
  27. 2017Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillationcited by 62
  28. 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
  29. 2023Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Modelscited by 19
  30. 2020Generalized SHAP: Generating multiple types of explanations in machine learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.