Explaining Probabilistic Models with Distributional Values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A large branch of explainable machine learning is grounded in cooperative game theory. However, research indicates that game-theoretic explanations may mislead or be hard to interpret. We argue that often there is a critical mismatch between what one wishes to explain (e.g. the output of a classifier) and what current methods such as SHAP explain (e.g. the scalar probability of a class). This paper addresses such gap for probabilistic models by generalising cooperative games and value operators. We introduce the distributional values, random variables that track changes in the model output (e.g. flipping of the predicted class) and derive their analytic expressions for games with Gaussian, Bernoulli and Categorical payoffs. We further establish several characterising properties, and show that our framework provides fine-grained and insightful explanations with case studies on vision and language models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.
Builds on
42 of 72 references.
References · 42
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
30 more
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
- 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 281
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 210
- 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
- 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
- 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
- 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 153
- 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
- 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2021Sampling Permutations for Shapley Value Estimationcited by 101
- 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
- 2020Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible Neuronscited by 98
- 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
- 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 97
- 2017Structured Attention Networkscited by 95
- 2020Shapley explainability on the data manifoldcited by 88
- 2020A Distributional Framework for Data Valuationcited by 79
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretabilitycited by 75
- 2017Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillationcited by 62
- 2019FlipTest: Fairness Testing via Optimal Transportcited by 51
- 2023Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Modelscited by 19
- 2020Generalized SHAP: Generating multiple types of explanations in machine learningcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.