mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Rethinking U-net Skip Connections for Biomedical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2402.08276 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The U-net architecture has significantly impacted deep learning-based segmentation of medical images. Through the integration of long-range skip connections, it facilitated the preservation of high-resolution features. Out-of-distribution data can, however, substantially impede the performance of neural networks. Previous works showed that the trained network layers differ in their susceptibility to this domain shift, e.g., shallow layers are more affected than deeper layers. In this work, we investigate the implications of this observation of layer sensitivity to domain shifts of U-net-style segmentation networks. By copying features of shallow layers to corresponding decoder blocks, these bear the risk of re-introducing domain-specific information. We used a synthetic dataset to model different levels of data distribution shifts and evaluated the impact on downstream segmentation performance. We quantified the inherent domain susceptibility of each network layer, using the Hellinger distance. These experiments confirmed the higher domain susceptibility of earlier network layers. When gradually removing skip connections, a decrease in domain susceptibility of deeper layers could be observed. For downstream segmentation performance, the original U-net outperformed the variant without any skip connections. The best performance, however, was achieved when removing the uppermost skip connection - not only in the presence of domain shifts but also for in-domain test data. We validated our results on three clinical datasets - two histopathology datasets and one magnetic resonance dataset - with performance increases of up to 10% in-domain and 13% cross-domain when removing the uppermost skip connection.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2024.

Builds on

21 of 34 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,656
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,476
  4. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,239
  5. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,522
  6. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,429
  7. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,219
  8. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 615
  9. 2017CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learningcited by 460
  10. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  11. 2021UCTransNet: Rethinking the Skip Connections in U-Net from a Channel-wise Perspective with Transformercited by 197
  12. 2018Concurrent Spatial and Channel Squeeze & Excitation in Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 120
9 more
  1. 2021Instance Localization for Self-supervised Detection Pretrainingcited by 99
  2. 2022Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challengecited by 66
  3. 2018How deep is deep enough? -- Quantifying class separability in the hidden layers of deep neural networkscited by 28
  4. 2021Domain Generalization for Mammography Detection via Multi-style and Multi-view Contrastive Learningcited by 19
  5. 2022Pan-tumor CAnine cuTaneous Cancer Histology (CATCH) datasetcited by 15
  6. 2020First U-Net Layers Contain More Domain Specific Information Than The Last Onescited by 10
  7. 2016Lightweight Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Convolutional Filter Reconstructioncited by 5
  8. 2022Mind the Gap: Scanner-induced domain shifts pose challenges for representation learning in histopathologycited by 5
  9. 2023Multi-Scanner Canine Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Histopathology Datasetcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.