mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Analysis of ImageNet Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models and DINOv2 in Medical Imaging Classification

arXiv 2402.07595 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024eess.IV cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Medical image analysis frequently encounters data scarcity challenges. Transfer learning has been effective in addressing this issue while conserving computational resources. The recent advent of foundational models like the DINOv2, which uses the vision transformer architecture, has opened new opportunities in the field and gathered significant interest. However, DINOv2's performance on clinical data still needs to be verified. In this paper, we performed a glioma grading task using three clinical modalities of brain MRI data. We compared the performance of various pre-trained deep learning models, including those based on ImageNet and DINOv2, in a transfer learning context. Our focus was on understanding the impact of the freezing mechanism on performance. We also validated our findings on three other types of public datasets: chest radiography, fundus radiography, and dermoscopy. Our findings indicate that in our clinical dataset, DINOv2's performance was not as strong as ImageNet-based pre-trained models, whereas in public datasets, DINOv2 generally outperformed other models, especially when using the frozen mechanism. Similar performance was observed with various sizes of DINOv2 models across different tasks. In summary, DINOv2 is viable for medical image classification tasks, particularly with data resembling natural images. However, its effectiveness may vary with data that significantly differs from natural images such as MRI. In addition, employing smaller versions of the model can be adequate for medical task, offering resource-saving benefits. Our codes are available at https://github.com/GuanghuiFU/medical_DINOv2_eval.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

23 of 67 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  7. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  8. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  9. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  10. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  11. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
  12. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
11 more
  1. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
  2. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  3. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 260
  4. 2019REFUGE Challenge: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Automated Methods for Glaucoma Assessment from Fundus Photographscited by 228
  5. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  6. 2020A scoping review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNetcited by 54
  7. 2023Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?cited by 46
  8. 2023Evaluating General Purpose Vision Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis: An Experimental Study of DINOv2 on Radiology Benchmarkscited by 33
  9. 2023Towards a Psychological Generalist AI: A Survey of Current Applications of Large Language Models and Future Prospectscited by 8
  10. 2022Reproducibility in machine learning for medical imagingcited by 5
  11. 2023Morphology-Enhanced CAM-Guided SAM for weakly supervised Breast Lesion Segmentationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: