mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Quantifying the Preconditioning Effect of Adam

arXiv 2402.07114 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is a notable dearth of results characterizing the preconditioning effect of Adam and showing how it may alleviate the curse of ill-conditioning -- an issue plaguing gradient descent (GD). In this work, we perform a detailed analysis of Adam's preconditioning effect for quadratic functions and quantify to what extent Adam can mitigate the dependence on the condition number of the Hessian. Our key finding is that Adam can suffer less from the condition number but at the expense of suffering a dimension-dependent quantity. Specifically, for a d-dimensional quadratic with a diagonal Hessian having condition number kappa, we show that the effective condition number-like quantity controlling the iteration complexity of Adam without momentum is O(min(d, kappa)). For a diagonally dominant Hessian, we obtain a bound of O(min(d √d kappa, kappa)) for the corresponding quantity. Thus, when d < O(kappap) where p = 1 for a diagonal Hessian and p = 1/3 for a diagonally dominant Hessian, Adam can outperform GD (which has an O(kappa) dependence). On the negative side, our results suggest that Adam can be worse than GD for a sufficiently non-diagonal Hessian even if d ll O(kappa1/3); we corroborate this with empirical evidence. Finally, we extend our analysis to functions satisfying per-coordinate Lipschitz smoothness and a modified version of the Polyak-L ojasiewicz condition.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2024.

Builds on

24 of 33 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
  3. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  4. 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 561
  5. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
  6. 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 435
  7. 2015Coordinate Descent Algorithmscited by 218
  8. 2018AdaGrad stepsizes: Sharp convergence over nonconvex landscapescited by 182
  9. 2018On the Convergence of A Class of Adam-Type Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 173
  10. 2020A Simple Convergence Proof of Adam and Adagradcited by 169
  11. 2018On the Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Adaptive Stepsizescited by 155
  12. 2017Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradientscited by 136
12 more
  1. 2022Adam Can Converge Without Any Modification On Update Rulescited by 112
  2. 2018On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 91
  3. 2022Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGDcited by 80
  4. 2022The Power of Adaptivity in SGD: Self-Tuning Step Sizes with Unbounded Gradients and Affine Variancecited by 60
  5. 2023Convergence of AdaGrad for Non-convex Objectives: Simple Proofs and Relaxed Assumptionscited by 55
  6. 2023Toward Understanding Why Adam Converges Faster Than SGD for Transformerscited by 50
  7. 2023Beyond Uniform Smoothness: A Stopped Analysis of Adaptive SGDcited by 41
  8. 2021SUPER-ADAM: Faster and Universal Framework of Adaptive Gradientscited by 40
  9. 2019Escaping Saddle Points with Adaptive Gradient Methodscited by 34
  10. 2022Provable Adaptivity of Adam under Non-uniform Smoothnesscited by 30
  11. 2018A general system of differential equations to model first order adaptive algorithmscited by 28
  12. 2020Fast and Near-Optimal Diagonal Preconditioningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 10.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2024Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain Morecited by 134
  2. 2026Preconditioning Benefits of Spectral Orthogonalization in Muoncited by 28
  3. 2024AdaGrad under Anisotropic Smoothnesscited by 22
  4. 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Lawcited by 19
  5. 2025Towards Quantifying the Hessian Structure of Neural Networkscited by 13
  6. 2024Gradient Methods with Online Scalingcited by 11
  7. 2024Diagonalization without Diagonalization: A Direct Optimization Approach for Solid-State Density Functional Theorycited by 2
  8. 2025LightSAM: Parameter-Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 2
  9. 2025Adam or Gauss-Newton? A Comparative Study In Terms of Basis Alignment and SGD Noisecited by 2
  10. 2026AdaMeZO: Adam-style Zeroth-Order Optimizer for LLM Fine-tuning Without Maintaining the Momentscited by 2
  11. 2026Leveraging Second-Order Curvature for Efficient Learned Image Compression: Theory and Empirical Evidencecited by 1
  12. 2026Sparse Layer Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 1
7 more
  1. 2026Muon Learns More Robust and Transferable Features than Adamcited by 1
  2. 2026Finite-Horizon Input-Output Dynamics of Minibatch Perturbations in AdamWcited by 1
  3. 2026Blockwise Stabilized Adaptive Cubic Regularization with Subsolvers via Recurrencecited by 1
  4. 2024OP-LoRA: The Blessing of Dimensionalitycited by 0
  5. 2026Distribution-Specific Curvature Control with Finite-Sample Guarantees for Open-Weight Safetycited by 0
  6. 2026On the Principles Behind Neural Network Optimizerscited by 0
  7. 2026Scalable Kronecker-Fisher Approximation: Efficient Hessian Analysis for Billion-Parameter Language Models Compressioncited by 0