mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mixture of Robust Experts (MoRE):A Robust Denoising Method towards multiple perturbations

arXiv 2104.10586 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To tackle the susceptibility of deep neural networks to adversarial examples, the adversarial training has been proposed which provides a notion of security through an inner maximization problem presenting the first-order adversaries embedded within the outer minimization of the training loss. To generalize the adversarial robustness over different perturbation types, the adversarial training method has been augmented with the improved inner maximization presenting a union of multiple perturbations e.g., various ℓp norm-bounded perturbations. However, the improved inner maximization only enjoys limited flexibility in terms of the allowable perturbation types. In this work, through a gating mechanism, we assemble a set of expert networks, each one either adversarially trained to deal with a particular perturbation type or normally trained for boosting accuracy on clean data. The gating module assigns weights dynamically to each expert to achieve superior accuracy under various data types e.g., adversarial examples, adverse weather perturbations, and clean input. In order to deal with the obfuscated gradients issue, the training of the gating module is conducted together with fine-tuning of the last fully connected layers of expert networks through adversarial training approach. Using extensive experiments, we show that our Mixture of Robust Experts (MoRE) approach enables a flexible integration of a broad range of robust experts with superior performance.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2021.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  7. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  8. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  9. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  12. 2016Expert Gate: Lifelong Learning with a Network of Expertscited by 369
11 more
  1. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness via Promoting Ensemble Diversitycited by 213
  2. 2019Topology Attack and Defense for Graph Neural Networks: An Optimization Perspectivecited by 196
  3. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
  4. 2017EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examplescited by 154
  5. 2020RayS: A Ray Searching Method for Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 94
  6. 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
  7. 2020Adversarial Distributional Training for Robust Deep Learningcited by 79
  8. 2020DVERGE: Diversifying Vulnerabilities for Enhanced Robust Generation of Ensemblescited by 73
  9. 2019Improving Adversarial Robustness of Ensembles with Diversity Trainingcited by 69
  10. 2018Structured Adversarial Attack: Towards General Implementation and Better Interpretabilitycited by 63
  11. 2020Attribute-Guided Adversarial Training for Robustness to Natural Perturbationscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

6 papers.