mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A High Dimensional Statistical Model for Adversarial Training: Geometry and Trade-Offs

arXiv 2402.05674 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2024stat.ML cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work investigates adversarial training in the context of margin-based linear classifiers in the high-dimensional regime where the dimension d and the number of data points n diverge with a fixed ratio α = n / d. We introduce a tractable mathematical model where the interplay between the data and adversarial attacker geometries can be studied, while capturing the core phenomenology observed in the adversarial robustness literature. Our main theoretical contribution is an exact asymptotic description of the sufficient statistics for the adversarial empirical risk minimiser, under generic convex and non-increasing losses for a Block Feature Model. Our result allow us to precisely characterise which directions in the data are associated with a higher generalisation/robustness trade-off, as defined by a robustness and a usefulness metric. We show that the the presence of multiple different feature types is crucial to the high sample complexity performances of adversarial training. In particular, we unveil the existence of directions which can be defended without penalising accuracy. Finally, we show the advantage of defending non-robust features during training, identifying a uniform protection as an inherently effective defence mechanism.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.

Builds on

48 of 90 references.

References · 48

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  8. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  9. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  10. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  11. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  12. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
36 more
  1. 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
  2. 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
  3. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  4. 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
  5. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
  6. 2021Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student modelcited by 126
  7. 2020The Gaussian equivalence of generative models for learning with shallow neural networkscited by 113
  8. 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 87
  9. 2018A modern maximum-likelihood theory for high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 79
  10. 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 76
  11. 2022Universality of empirical risk minimizationcited by 73
  12. 2016A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examplescited by 70
  13. 2020A Random Matrix Analysis of Random Fourier Features: Beyond the Gaussian Kernel, a Precise Phase Transition, and the Corresponding Double Descentcited by 69
  14. 2020The role of regularization in classification of high-dimensional noisy Gaussian mixturecited by 63
  15. 2019Lower Bounds on Adversarial Robustness from Optimal Transportcited by 52
  16. 2021Learning Gaussian Mixtures with Generalised Linear Models: Precise Asymptotics in High-dimensionscited by 52
  17. 2020Generalization error in high-dimensional perceptrons: Approaching Bayes error with convex optimizationcited by 51
  18. 2020Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Trainingcited by 49
  19. 2021Graph-based Approximate Message Passing Iterationscited by 35
  20. 2023Deterministic equivalent and error universality of deep random features learningcited by 35
  21. 2023Universality laws for Gaussian mixtures in generalized linear modelscited by 28
  22. 2022Gaussian Universality of Perceptrons with Random Labelscited by 26
  23. 2023Are Gaussian data all you need? Extents and limits of universality in high-dimensional generalized linear estimationcited by 25
  24. 2022What Can the Neural Tangent Kernel Tell Us About Adversarial Robustness?cited by 21
  25. 2022Theoretical characterization of uncertainty in high-dimensional linear classificationcited by 18
  26. 2023Regularization properties of adversarially-trained linear regressioncited by 17
  27. 2022Can we achieve robustness from data alone?cited by 16
  28. 2022On double-descent in uncertainty quantification in overparametrized modelscited by 15
  29. 2023High-dimensional robust regression under heavy-tailed data: Asymptotics and Universalitycited by 15
  30. 2023Adversarial Attacks on Traffic Sign Recognition: A Surveycited by 13
  31. 2022Improving Adversarial Robustness by Putting More Regularizations on Less Robust Samplescited by 11
  32. 2023Classification of Heavy-tailed Features in High Dimensions: a Superstatistical Approachcited by 11
  33. 2018Revisiting Adversarial Riskcited by 9
  34. 2023Average case analysis of Lasso under ultra-sparse conditionscited by 5
  35. 2023How many dimensions are required to find an adversarial example?cited by 5
  36. 2017A Random Block-Coordinate Douglas-Rachford Splitting Method with Low Computational Complexity for Binary Logistic Regressioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.