mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Geometry of Regularization in Adversarial Training: High-Dimensional Asymptotics and Generalization Bounds

arXiv 2410.16073 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2024stat.ML cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regularization, whether explicit in terms of a penalty in the loss or implicit in the choice of algorithm, is a cornerstone of modern machine learning. Indeed, controlling the complexity of the model class is particularly important when data is scarce, noisy or contaminated, as it translates a statistical belief on the underlying structure of the data. This work investigates the question of how to choose the regularization norm lVert · rVert in the context of high-dimensional adversarial training for binary classification. To this end, we first derive an exact asymptotic description of the robust, regularized empirical risk minimizer for various types of adversarial attacks and regularization norms (including non-ℓp norms). We complement this analysis with a uniform convergence analysis, deriving bounds on the Rademacher Complexity for this class of problems. Leveraging our theoretical results, we quantitatively characterize the relationship between perturbation size and the optimal choice of lVert · rVert, confirming the intuition that, in the data scarce regime, the type of regularization becomes increasingly important for adversarial training as perturbations grow in size.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.

Builds on

43 of 88 references.

References · 43

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  5. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  7. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  8. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
  9. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  10. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
  11. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
  12. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
31 more
  1. 2018Characterizing Implicit Bias in Terms of Optimization Geometrycited by 266
  2. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 208
  3. 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
  4. 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
  5. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
  6. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  7. 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
  8. 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 127
  9. 2021Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student modelcited by 126
  10. 2020The Gaussian equivalence of generative models for learning with shallow neural networkscited by 113
  11. 2022More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations Generalizecited by 91
  12. 2019Adversarially Robust Generalization Just Requires More Unlabeled Datacited by 76
  13. 2022Universality of empirical risk minimizationcited by 75
  14. 2016A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examplescited by 70
  15. 2020A Random Matrix Analysis of Random Fourier Features: Beyond the Gaussian Kernel, a Precise Phase Transition, and the Corresponding Double Descentcited by 70
  16. 2020The role of regularization in classification of high-dimensional noisy Gaussian mixturecited by 63
  17. 2019Lower Bounds on Adversarial Robustness from Optimal Transportcited by 53
  18. 2020Generalization error in high-dimensional perceptrons: Approaching Bayes error with convex optimizationcited by 51
  19. 2020Precise Statistical Analysis of Classification Accuracies for Adversarial Trainingcited by 50
  20. 2020Adversarial Learning Guarantees for Linear Hypotheses and Neural Networkscited by 47
  21. 2022The curse of overparametrization in adversarial training: Precise analysis of robust generalization for random features regressioncited by 41
  22. 2023Deterministic equivalent and error universality of deep random features learningcited by 35
  23. 2023Universality laws for Gaussian mixtures in generalized linear modelscited by 28
  24. 2022Gaussian Universality of Perceptrons with Random Labelscited by 26
  25. 2023Are Gaussian data all you need? Extents and limits of universality in high-dimensional generalized linear estimationcited by 26
  26. 2023High-dimensional robust regression under heavy-tailed data: Asymptotics and Universalitycited by 15
  27. 2024Asymptotics of Learning with Deep Structured (Random) Featurescited by 13
  28. 2023Classification of Heavy-tailed Features in High Dimensions: a Superstatistical Approachcited by 11
  29. 2024A High Dimensional Statistical Model for Adversarial Training: Geometry and Trade-Offscited by 7
  30. 2023Average case analysis of Lasso under ultra-sparse conditionscited by 5
  31. 2024The Price of Implicit Bias in Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.