Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoencoders are a prominent model in many empirical branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, basic theoretical questions remain unanswered even in a shallow two-layer setting. In particular, to what degree does a shallow autoencoder capture the structure of the underlying data distribution? For the prototypical case of the 1-bit compression of sparse Gaussian data, we prove that gradient descent converges to a solution that completely disregards the sparse structure of the input. Namely, the performance of the algorithm is the same as if it was compressing a Gaussian source - with no sparsity. For general data distributions, we give evidence of a phase transition phenomenon in the shape of the gradient descent minimizer, as a function of the data sparsity: below the critical sparsity level, the minimizer is a rotation taken uniformly at random (just like in the compression of non-sparse data); above the critical sparsity, the minimizer is the identity (up to a permutation). Finally, by exploiting a connection with approximate message passing algorithms, we show how to improve upon Gaussian performance for the compression of sparse data: adding a denoising function to a shallow architecture already reduces the loss provably, and a suitable multi-layer decoder leads to a further improvement. We validate our findings on image datasets, such as CIFAR-10 and MNIST.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
28 of 48 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
- 2016End-to-end Optimized Image Compressioncited by 673
- 2017Lossy Image Compression with Compressive Autoencoderscited by 289
- 2019Understanding Straight-Through Estimator in Training Activation Quantized Neural Netscited by 225
- 2017Soft-to-Hard Vector Quantization for End-to-End Learning Compressible Representationscited by 149
- 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamicscited by 142
- 2022The merged-staircase property: a necessary and nearly sufficient condition for SGD learning of sparse functions on two-layer neural networkscited by 141
- 2019Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Linear Neural Networkscited by 122
- 2021Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Deep Linear Networks: Small Initialization Training, Symmetry, and Sparsitycited by 83
- 2021The staircase property: How hierarchical structure can guide deep learningcited by 62
- 2023Learning time-scales in two-layers neural networkscited by 57
16 more
- 2023Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 54
- 2023Transformers learn through gradual rank increasecited by 52
- 2021A unifying tutorial on Approximate Message Passingcited by 49
- 2019Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoderscited by 45
- 2023On the Stepwise Nature of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 36
- 2022The dynamics of representation learning in shallow, non-linear autoencoderscited by 27
- 2022Incremental Learning in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 27
- 2020Regularized linear autoencoders recover the principal components, eventuallycited by 26
- 2020Approximate Message Passing with Spectral Initialization for Generalized Linear Modelscited by 22
- 2023High-dimensional Asymptotics of Denoising Autoencoderscited by 19
- 2021Estimation in Rotationally Invariant Generalized Linear Models via Approximate Message Passingcited by 18
- 2021Analysis of feature learning in weight-tied autoencoders via the mean field lenscited by 13
- 2021A General Derivative Identity for the Conditional Mean Estimator in Gaussian Noise and Some Applicationscited by 7
- 2021Implicit Regularization in Deep Tensor Factorizationcited by 5
- 2022Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methodscited by 3
- 2023Learning from higher-order statistics, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2024On the Feature Learning in Diffusion Modelscited by 19
- 2026A theory of learning data statistics in diffusion models, from easy to hardcited by 5
- 2026Distributional simplicity bias and effective convexity in Energy Based Modelscited by 0
- 2026A Fourier perspective on the learning dynamics of neural networks: from sample complexities to mechanistic insightscited by 0
- 2026A Fourier perspective on the learning dynamics of neural networks: from sample complexities to mechanistic insights16 May 2026
- 2026Distributional simplicity bias and effective convexity in Energy Based Models8 May 2026
- 2026A theory of learning data statistics in diffusion models, from easy to hard13 Mar 2026
- 2024On the Feature Learning in Diffusion Models2 Dec 2024