mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of feature learning in weight-tied autoencoders via the mean field lens

arXiv 2102.08373 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2021cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn math.STcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autoencoders are among the earliest introduced nonlinear models for unsupervised learning. Although they are widely adopted beyond research, it has been a longstanding open problem to understand mathematically the feature extraction mechanism that trained nonlinear autoencoders provide. In this work, we make progress in this problem by analyzing a class of two-layer weight-tied nonlinear autoencoders in the mean field framework. Upon a suitable scaling, in the regime of a large number of neurons, the models trained with stochastic gradient descent are shown to admit a mean field limiting dynamics. This limiting description reveals an asymptotically precise picture of feature learning by these models: their training dynamics exhibit different phases that correspond to the learning of different principal subspaces of the data, with varying degrees of nonlinear shrinkage dependent on the ℓ2-regularization and stopping time. While we prove these results under an idealized assumption of (correlated) Gaussian data, experiments on real-life data demonstrate an interesting match with the theory. The autoencoder setup of interests poses a nontrivial mathematical challenge to proving these results. In this setup, the "Lipschitz" constants of the models grow with the data dimension d. Consequently an adaptation of previous analyses requires a number of neurons N that is at least exponential in d. Our main technical contribution is a new argument which proves that the required N is only polynomial in d. We conjecture that Ngg d is sufficient and that N is necessarily larger than a data-dependent intrinsic dimension, a behavior that is fundamentally different from previously studied setups.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2021.

Builds on

31 of 64 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  3. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  4. 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
  5. 2020When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?cited by 150
  6. 2019Implicit Regularization of Discrete Gradient Dynamics in Linear Neural Networkscited by 122
  7. 2018Trainability and Accuracy of Neural Networks: An Interacting Particle System Approachcited by 105
  8. 2020A Rigorous Framework for the Mean Field Limit of Multilayer Neural Networkscited by 68
  9. 2020A Mean-field Analysis of Deep ResNet and Beyond: Towards Provable Optimization Via Overparameterization From Depthcited by 56
  10. 2017Stochastic Particle Gradient Descent for Infinite Ensemblescited by 52
  11. 2019Sparse Optimization on Measures with Over-parameterized Gradient Descentcited by 50
  12. 2019Machine Learning from a Continuous Viewpointcited by 50
19 more
  1. 2019Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoderscited by 45
  2. 2020Modeling from Features: a Mean-field Framework for Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networkscited by 44
  3. 2015A Deep Learning Approach to Structured Signal Recoverycited by 43
  4. 2020On the Convergence of Gradient Descent Training for Two-layer ReLU-networks in the Mean Field Regimecited by 38
  5. 2019Landscape Connectivity and Dropout Stability of SGD Solutions for Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 35
  6. 2019Identity Crisis: Memorization and Generalization under Extreme Overparameterizationcited by 33
  7. 2019Analysis of a Two-Layer Neural Network via Displacement Convexitycited by 27
  8. 2020Regularized linear autoencoders recover the principal components, eventuallycited by 26
  9. 2019Mean Field Limit of the Learning Dynamics of Multilayer Neural Networkscited by 25
  10. 2019Global convergence of neuron birth-death dynamicscited by 22
  11. 2018On the Learning Dynamics of Deep Neural Networkscited by 18
  12. 2020Global optimality of softmax policy gradient with single hidden layer neural networks in the mean-field regimecited by 17
  13. 2019Benefits of Jointly Training Autoencoders: An Improved Neural Tangent Kernel Analysiscited by 13
  14. 2015Why Regularized Auto-Encoders learn Sparse Representation?cited by 11
  15. 2017Sparse Coding and Autoencoderscited by 11
  16. 2019Disentangling feature and lazy training in deep neural networkscited by 10
  17. 2020The Quenching-Activation Behavior of the Gradient Descent Dynamics for Two-layer Neural Network Modelscited by 7
  18. 2020A Note on the Global Convergence of Multilayer Neural Networks in the Mean Field Regimecited by 4
  19. 2018Memorization in Overparameterized Autoencoderscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: