Foundation Model Makes Clustering A Better Initialization For Cold-Start Active Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning selects the most informative samples from the unlabelled dataset to annotate in the context of a limited annotation budget. While numerous methods have been proposed for subsequent sample selection based on an initialized model, scant attention has been paid to the indispensable phase of active learning: selecting samples for model cold-start initialization. Most of the previous studies resort to random sampling or naive clustering. However, random sampling is prone to fluctuation, and naive clustering suffers from convergence speed, particularly when dealing with high-dimensional data such as imaging data. In this work, we propose to integrate foundation models with clustering methods to select samples for cold-start active learning initialization. Foundation models refer to those trained on massive datasets by the self-supervised paradigm and capable of generating informative and compacted embeddings for various downstream tasks. Leveraging these embeddings to replace raw features such as pixel values, clustering quickly converges and identifies better initial samples. For a comprehensive comparison, we included a classic ImageNet-supervised model to acquire embeddings. Experiments on two clinical tasks of image classification and segmentation demonstrated that foundation model-based clustering efficiently pinpointed informative initial samples, leading to models showcasing enhanced performance than the baseline methods. We envisage that this study provides an effective paradigm for future cold-start active learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2024.
Builds on
19 of 41 references.
References · 19
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019A Survey on Active Learning and Human-in-the-Loop Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 150
- 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
- 2021TorchXRayVision: A library of chest X-ray datasets and modelscited by 131
- 2020Convolutional Networks with Dense Connectivitycited by 98
- 2022Integrated multimodal artificial intelligence framework for healthcare applicationscited by 69
- 2021HarmoFL: Harmonizing Local and Global Drifts in Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Medical Imagescited by 62
- 2020Optimization for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory and Practice when evaluating with Dice Score or Jaccard Indexcited by 52
- 2021Deep learning for temporal data representation in electronic health records: A systematic review of challenges and methodologiescited by 34
- 2021A Structure-Aware Relation Network for Thoracic Diseases Detection and Segmentationcited by 33
- 2021DSAL: Deeply Supervised Active Learning from Strong and Weak Labelers for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 27
7 more
- 2023Active learning for medical image segmentation with stochastic batchescited by 20
- 2020Deep Active Learning for Joint Classification & Segmentation with Weak Annotatorcited by 16
- 2023ALWOD: Active Learning for Weakly-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 8
- 2021AutoScore-Imbalance: An interpretable machine learning tool for development of clinical scores with rare events datacited by 6
- 2022All models are wrong, but which are useful? Comparing parametric and nonparametric estimation of causal effects in finite samplescited by 6
- 2022An empirical study of the effect of background data size on the stability of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for deep learning modelscited by 4
- 2023Leveraging Anatomical Constraints with Uncertainty for Pneumothorax Segmentationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.