mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Q-learning with Bellman Infinity-error

arXiv 2402.02165 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Adversarial robustness and RL in finance

Abstract (arXiv)

Establishing robust policies is essential to counter attacks or disturbances affecting deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents. Recent studies explore state-adversarial robustness and suggest the potential lack of an optimal robust policy (ORP), posing challenges in setting strict robustness constraints. This work further investigates ORP: At first, we introduce a consistency assumption of policy (CAP) stating that optimal actions in the Markov decision process remain consistent with minor perturbations, supported by empirical and theoretical evidence. Building upon CAP, we crucially prove the existence of a deterministic and stationary ORP that aligns with the Bellman optimal policy. Furthermore, we illustrate the necessity of L∞-norm when minimizing Bellman error to attain ORP. This finding clarifies the vulnerability of prior DRL algorithms that target the Bellman optimal policy with L1-norm and motivates us to train a Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network (CAR-DQN) by minimizing a surrogate of Bellman Infinity-error. The top-tier performance of CAR-DQN across various benchmarks validates its practical effectiveness and reinforces the soundness of our theoretical analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial robustness and RL in finance, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 37 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2024.

Builds on

37 of 44 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  5. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  6. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
  7. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  8. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
  9. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
  10. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
  11. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
  12. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 320
25 more
  1. 2019Reinforcement Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 310
  2. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 238
  3. 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 214
  4. 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 213
  5. 2019Towards Stable and Efficient Training of Verifiably Robust Neural Networkscited by 205
  6. 2017Tactics of Adversarial Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 166
  7. 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 154
  8. 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversarycited by 135
  9. 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
  10. 2017Vulnerability of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Policy Induction Attackscited by 91
  11. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Losscited by 75
  12. 2021BACKDOORL: Backdoor Attack against Competitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  13. 2021Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLcited by 55
  14. 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 51
  15. 2022Efficient Adversarial Training without Attacking: Worst-Case-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 43
  16. 2023Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with State Uncertaintycited by 36
  17. 2017Whatever Does Not Kill Deep Reinforcement Learning, Makes It Strongercited by 35
  18. 2019Online Robustness Training for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
  19. 2023Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial Regularization: Theoretical Foundation and Stable Algorithmscited by 25
  20. 2022PolicyCleanse: Backdoor Detection and Mitigation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  21. 2023Adversarial Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Redefining Robustnesscited by 19
  22. 2022Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  23. 2019Snooping Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  24. 2022Adversarial Cheap Talkcited by 16
  25. 2023Improve Robustness of Reinforcement Learning against Observation Perturbations via l_∞ Lipschitz Policy Networkscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Reinforcement Learning with Infinity Measurement Error
  2. 2026A Unified and Constrained View of Regularization-Based Robust Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Finite-Time Convergence of Single-Trajectory Chi-Square Robust Q-Learning With Linear Function Approximation
  4. 2025Distributionally Robust Deep Q-Learning
  5. 2026Robust Asynchronous Q-Learning under Reward and State Corruption via Batching
  6. 2024Beyond Worst-case Attacks: Robust RL with Adaptive Defense via Non-dominated Policies
  7. 2024Training Verifiably Robust Agents Using Set-Based Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2024On Robust Reinforcement Learning with Lipschitz-Bounded Policy Networks