mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-fidelity physics constrained neural networks for dynamical systems

arXiv 2402.02031 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2024cs.LG physics.flu-dyncited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-constrained neural networks are commonly employed to enhance prediction robustness compared to purely data-driven models, achieved through the inclusion of physical constraint losses during the model training process. However, one of the major challenges of physics-constrained neural networks consists of the training complexity especially for high-dimensional systems. In fact, conventional physics-constrained models rely on singular-fidelity data necessitating the assessment of physical constraints within high-dimensional fields, which introduces computational difficulties. Furthermore, due to the fixed input size of the neural networks, employing multi-fidelity training data can also be cumbersome. In this paper, we propose the Multi-Scale Physics-Constrained Neural Network (MSPCNN), which offers a novel methodology for incorporating data with different levels of fidelity into a unified latent space through a customised multi-fidelity autoencoder. Additionally, multiple decoders are concurrently trained to map latent representations of inputs into various fidelity physical spaces. As a result, during the training of predictive models, physical constraints can be evaluated within low-fidelity spaces, yielding a trade-off between training efficiency and accuracy. In addition, unlike conventional methods, MSPCNN also manages to employ multi-fidelity data to train the predictive model. We assess the performance of MSPCNN in two fluid dynamics problems, namely a two-dimensional Burgers' system and a shallow water system. Numerical results clearly demonstrate the enhancement of prediction accuracy and noise robustness when introducing physical constraints in low-fidelity fields. On the other hand, as expected, the training complexity can be significantly reduced by computing physical constraint loss in the low-fidelity field rather than the high-fidelity one.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2024.

Builds on

13 of 63 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
  2. 2018Deep Fluids: A Generative Network for Parameterized Fluid Simulationscited by 121
  3. 2019Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4D flow MRI data using physics-informed neural networkscited by 76
  4. 2019Physics-informed Autoencoders for Lyapunov-stable Fluid Flow Predictioncited by 67
  5. 2023Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Modeling and Control of Dynamical Systemscited by 28
  6. 2022Generalised Latent Assimilation in Heterogeneous Reduced Spaces with Machine Learning Surrogate Modelscited by 24
  7. 2020Multi-fidelity Generative Deep Learning Turbulent Flowscited by 21
  8. 2022Multi-fidelity surrogate modeling using long short-term memory networkscited by 18
  9. 2023Multi-fidelity reduced-order surrogate modelingcited by 18
  10. 2021Real-time simulation of parameter-dependent fluid flows through deep learning-based reduced order modelscited by 12
  11. 2020Latent-space time evolution of non-intrusive reduced-order models using Gaussian process emulationcited by 11
  12. 2019Background Error Covariance Iterative Updating with Invariant Observation Measures for Data Assimilationcited by 6
1 more
  1. 2022textitFastSVD-ML-ROM: A Reduced-Order Modeling Framework based on Machine Learning for Real-Time Applicationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.