σ-zero: Gradient-based Optimization of ℓ0-norm Adversarial Examples
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating the adversarial robustness of deep networks to gradient-based attacks is challenging. While most attacks consider ℓ2- and ℓ_∞-norm constraints to craft input perturbations, only a few investigate sparse ℓ1- and ℓ0-norm attacks. In particular, ℓ0-norm attacks remain the least studied due to the inherent complexity of optimizing over a non-convex and non-differentiable constraint. However, evaluating adversarial robustness under these attacks could reveal weaknesses otherwise left untested with more conventional ℓ2- and ℓ_∞-norm attacks. In this work, we propose a novel ℓ0-norm attack, called σ-zero, which leverages a differentiable approximation of the ℓ0 norm to facilitate gradient-based optimization, and an adaptive projection operator to dynamically adjust the trade-off between loss minimization and perturbation sparsity. Extensive evaluations using MNIST, CIFAR10, and ImageNet datasets, involving robust and non-robust models, show that σtexttt-zero finds minimum ℓ0-norm adversarial examples without requiring any time-consuming hyperparameter tuning, and that it outperforms all competing sparse attacks in terms of success rate, perturbation size, and efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.
Builds on
34 of 50 references.
References · 34
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
22 more
- 2017EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examplescited by 154
- 2020Adversarial Robustness: From Self-Supervised Pre-Training to Fine-Tuningcited by 152
- 2018Decoupling Direction and Norm for Efficient Gradient-Based L2 Adversarial Attacks and Defensescited by 109
- 2019Sparse and Imperceivable Adversarial Attackscited by 95
- 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94
- 2020Adversarial Robustness on In- and Out-Distribution Improves Explainabilitycited by 73
- 2020Sparse-RS: a versatile framework for query-efficient sparse black-box adversarial attackscited by 65
- 2022A Light Recipe to Train Robust Vision Transformerscited by 64
- 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
- 2018Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Researchcited by 57
- 2021Fast Minimum-norm Adversarial Attacks through Adaptive Norm Constraintscited by 50
- 2021Mind the box: l1-APGD for sparse adversarial attacks on image classifierscited by 50
- 2023Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNscited by 46
- 2019Accurate, reliable and fast robustness evaluationcited by 43
- 2022Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
- 2023Exploring and Exploiting Decision Boundary Dynamics for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 35
- 2022Energy-Latency Attacks via Sponge Poisoningcited by 29
- 2020Augmented Lagrangian Adversarial Attackscited by 28
- 2021Indicators of Attack Failure: Debugging and Improving Optimization of Adversarial Examplescited by 23
- 2021PDPGD: Primal-Dual Proximal Gradient Descent Adversarial Attackcited by 8
- 2020Stochastic sparse adversarial attackscited by 4
- 2023Minimizing Energy Consumption of Deep Learning Models by Energy-Aware Trainingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024AttackBench: Evaluating Gradient-based Attacks for Adversarial Examplescited by 14
- 2025Evaluating the Evaluators: Trust in Adversarial Robustness Testscited by 2
- 2025Fast Adversarial Training against Sparse Attacks Requires Loss Smoothingcited by 0
- 2025Evaluating the robustness of adversarial defenses in malware detection systemscited by 0
- 2026Exploring Sparsity and Smoothness of Arbitrary Lp Norms in Adversarial Attackscited by 0
- 2026Adversarial Frontiers: Minimum-Norm Attack Ensembles for Robustness Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Fast LapSum: Exact Differentiable Top-k at Million Scalecited by 0
- 2026Fast LapSum: Exact Differentiable Top-k at Million Scale7 Aug 2026
- 2026Adversarial Frontiers: Minimum-Norm Attack Ensembles for Robustness Evaluation22 Jul 2026
- 2026Exploring Sparsity and Smoothness of Arbitrary Lp Norms in Adversarial Attacks6 Feb 2026
- 2025Evaluating the Evaluators: Trust in Adversarial Robustness Tests4 Jul 2025
- 2025Evaluating the robustness of adversarial defenses in malware detection systems14 May 2025
- 2025Fast Adversarial Training against Sparse Attacks Requires Loss Smoothing28 Feb 2025
- 2024AttackBench: Evaluating Gradient-based Attacks for Adversarial Examples30 Apr 2024