mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"Which LLM should I use?": Evaluating LLMs for tasks performed by Undergraduate Computer Science Students

arXiv 2402.01687 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2024cs.CY cs.HC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study evaluates the effectiveness of various large language models (LLMs) in performing tasks common among undergraduate computer science students. Although a number of research studies in the computing education community have explored the possibility of using LLMs for a variety of tasks, there is a lack of comprehensive research comparing different LLMs and evaluating which LLMs are most effective for different tasks. Our research systematically assesses some of the publicly available LLMs such as Google Bard, ChatGPT(3.5), GitHub Copilot Chat, and Microsoft Copilot across diverse tasks commonly encountered by undergraduate computer science students in India. These tasks include code explanation and documentation, solving class assignments, technical interview preparation, learning new concepts and frameworks, and email writing. Evaluation for these tasks was carried out by pre-final year and final year undergraduate computer science students and provides insights into the models' strengths and limitations. This study aims to guide students as well as instructors in selecting suitable LLMs for any specific task and offers valuable insights on how LLMs can be used constructively by students and instructors.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.

Builds on

7 of 32 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022Conversing with Copilot: Exploring Prompt Engineering for Solving CS1 Problems Using Natural Languagecited by 82
  2. 2023On the Educational Impact of ChatGPT: Is Artificial Intelligence Ready to Obtain a University Degree?cited by 48
  3. 2023Can GPT-4 Support Analysis of Textual Data in Tasks Requiring Highly Specialized Domain Expertise?cited by 31
  4. 2023ChatGPT in the Classroom: An Analysis of Its Strengths and Weaknesses for Solving Undergraduate Computer Science Questionscited by 13
  5. 2023ChatGPT, Can You Generate Solutions for my Coding Exercises? An Evaluation on its Effectiveness in an undergraduate Java Programming Coursecited by 12
  6. 2023"It's not like Jarvis, but it's pretty close!" -- Examining ChatGPT's Usage among Undergraduate Students in Computer Sciencecited by 10
  7. 2014Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of Web search engines using a representative query samplecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.