Graph Contrastive Learning with Cohesive Subgraph Awareness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph contrastive learning (GCL) has emerged as a state-of-the-art strategy for learning representations of diverse graphs including social and biomedical networks. GCL widely uses stochastic graph topology augmentation, such as uniform node dropping, to generate augmented graphs. However, such stochastic augmentations may severely damage the intrinsic properties of a graph and deteriorate the following representation learning process. We argue that incorporating an awareness of cohesive subgraphs during the graph augmentation and learning processes has the potential to enhance GCL performance. To this end, we propose a novel unified framework called CTAug, to seamlessly integrate cohesion awareness into various existing GCL mechanisms. In particular, CTAug comprises two specialized modules: topology augmentation enhancement and graph learning enhancement. The former module generates augmented graphs that carefully preserve cohesion properties, while the latter module bolsters the graph encoder's ability to discern subgraph patterns. Theoretical analysis shows that CTAug can strictly improve existing GCL mechanisms. Empirical experiments verify that CTAug can achieve state-of-the-art performance for graph representation learning, especially for graphs with high degrees. The code is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10594093, or https://github.com/wuyucheng2002/CTAug.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2024.
Builds on
31 of 64 references.
References · 31
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 881
- 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
- 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
- 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 652
19 more
- 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 539
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
- 2019InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 441
- 2019Diffusion Improves Graph Learningcited by 414
- 2020Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Countingcited by 313
- 2021Graph Self-Supervised Learning: A Surveycited by 289
- 2021Graph Contrastive Learning Automatedcited by 287
- 2020Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?cited by 236
- 2020Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 217
- 2021Adversarial Graph Augmentation to Improve Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 200
- 2022SimGRACE: A Simple Framework for Graph Contrastive Learning without Data Augmentationcited by 171
- 2021Self-supervised Learning on Graphs: Contrastive, Generative,or Predictivecited by 136
- 2021An Empirical Study of Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 113
- 2021AutoGCL: Automated Graph Contrastive Learning via Learnable View Generatorscited by 73
- 2022Revisiting Graph Contrastive Learning from the Perspective of Graph Spectrumcited by 43
- 2020Multi-view Graph Contrastive Representation Learning for Drug-Drug Interaction Predictioncited by 41
- 2022Spectral Augmentation for Self-Supervised Learning on Graphscited by 39
- 2021Augmentations in Graph Contrastive Learning: Current Methodological Flaws & Towards Better Practicescited by 25
- 2014Accelerating Community Detection by Using K-core Subgraphscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025GRAVER: Generative Graph Vocabularies for Robust Graph Foundation Models Fine-tuningcited by 13
- 2024A Survey on Self-Supervised Graph Foundation Models: Knowledge-Based Perspectivecited by 9
- 2025HiTeC: Hierarchical Contrastive Learning on Text-Attributed Hypergraph with Semantic-Aware Augmentationcited by 2
- 2025Graph Contrastive Learning versus Untrained Baselines: The Role of Dataset Sizecited by 0
- 2025Cross-Paradigm Graph Backdoor Attacks with Promptable Subgraph Triggerscited by 0
- 2026Cross-attentive Cohesive Subgraph Embedding to Mitigate Oversquashing in GNNscited by 0
- 2026Cross-attentive Cohesive Subgraph Embedding to Mitigate Oversquashing in GNNs29 Mar 2026
- 2025GRAVER: Generative Graph Vocabularies for Robust Graph Foundation Models Fine-tuning5 Nov 2025
- 2025Cross-Paradigm Graph Backdoor Attacks with Promptable Subgraph Triggers26 Oct 2025
- 2025Graph Contrastive Learning versus Untrained Baselines: The Role of Dataset Size1 Sep 2025
- 2025HiTeC: Hierarchical Contrastive Learning on Text-Attributed Hypergraph with Semantic-Aware Augmentation5 Aug 2025
- 2024A Survey on Self-Supervised Graph Foundation Models: Knowledge-Based Perspective24 Mar 2024