mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CaMU: Disentangling Causal Effects in Deep Model Unlearning

arXiv 2401.17504 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2024cs.LG stat.MEcited by 7

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning requires removing the information of forgetting data while keeping the necessary information of remaining data. Despite recent advancements in this area, existing methodologies mainly focus on the effect of removing forgetting data without considering the negative impact this can have on the information of the remaining data, resulting in significant performance degradation after data removal. Although some methods try to repair the performance of remaining data after removal, the forgotten information can also return after repair. Such an issue is due to the intricate intertwining of the forgetting and remaining data. Without adequately differentiating the influence of these two kinds of data on the model, existing algorithms take the risk of either inadequate removal of the forgetting data or unnecessary loss of valuable information from the remaining data. To address this shortcoming, the present study undertakes a causal analysis of the unlearning and introduces a novel framework termed Causal Machine Unlearning (CaMU). This framework adds intervention on the information of remaining data to disentangle the causal effects between forgetting data and remaining data. Then CaMU eliminates the causal impact associated with forgetting data while concurrently preserving the causal relevance of the remaining data. Comprehensive empirical results on various datasets and models suggest that CaMU enhances performance on the remaining data and effectively minimizes the influences of forgetting data. Notably, this work is the first to interpret deep model unlearning tasks from a new perspective of causality and provide a solution based on causal analysis, which opens up new possibilities for future research in deep model unlearning.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2024.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Boundary Unlearning21 Mar
  2. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  3. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearning6 Sep
  4. 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teacher17 May
  5. 2022Deep Unlearning via Randomized Conditionally Independent Hessians15 Apr
  6. 2022Zero-Shot Machine Unlearning14 Jan
  7. 2021Fast Yet Effective Machine Unlearning17 Nov
  8. 2021Unrolling SGD: Understanding Factors Influencing Machine Unlearning27 Sep
  9. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 11

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  3. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  4. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  5. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
  6. 2020Machine Unlearning for Random Forestscited by 125
  7. 2021Distilling Causal Effect of Data in Class-Incremental Learningcited by 117
  8. 2020Variational Bayesian Unlearningcited by 114
  9. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  10. 2022Recommendation Unlearningcited by 71
  11. 2018Causal Generative Domain Adaptation Networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.