mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

YODA: Teacher-Student Progressive Learning for Language Models

arXiv 2401.15670 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated adeptness in a range of tasks, they still lag behind human learning efficiency. This disparity is often linked to the inherent human capacity to learn from basic examples, gradually generalize and handle more complex problems, and refine their skills with continuous feedback. Inspired by this, this paper introduces YODA, a novel teacher-student progressive learning framework that emulates the teacher-student education process to improve the efficacy of model fine-tuning. The framework operates on an interactive textitbasic-generalized-harder loop. The teacher agent provides tailored feedback on the student's answers, and systematically organizes the education process. This process unfolds by teaching the student basic examples, reinforcing understanding through generalized questions, and then enhancing learning by posing questions with progressively enhanced complexity. With the teacher's guidance, the student learns to iteratively refine its answer with feedback, and forms a robust and comprehensive understanding of the posed questions. The systematic procedural data, which reflects the progressive learning process of humans, is then utilized for model training. Taking math reasoning as a testbed, experiments show that training LLaMA2 with data from YODA improves SFT with significant performance gain (+17.01% on GSM8K and +9.98% on MATH). In addition, we find that training with curriculum learning further improves learning robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2024.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  9. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  10. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  11. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  12. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
14 more
  1. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  2. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
  3. 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 736
  4. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
  5. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
  6. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  7. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
  8. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
  9. 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 385
  10. 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
  11. 2023SwiftSage: A Generative Agent with Fast and Slow Thinking for Complex Interactive Taskscited by 166
  12. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  13. 2023Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RLcited by 77
  14. 2023Gaining Wisdom from Setbacks: Aligning Large Language Models via Mistake Analysiscited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Three Questions Concerning the Use of Large Language Models to Facilitate Mathematics Learning
  2. 2025EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs' Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework
  3. 2025MathEDU: Feedback Generation on Problem-Solving Processes for Mathematical Learning Support
  4. 2023Teaching Language Models to Self-Improve through Interactive Demonstrations
  5. 2025Socratic Students: Teaching Language Models to Learn by Asking Questions
  6. 2025Simulating LLM-to-LLM Tutoring for Multilingual Math Feedback
  7. 2026A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents
  8. 2025MASTER: Enhancing Large Language Model via Multi-Agent Simulated Teaching