mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GI-PIP: Do We Require Impractical Auxiliary Dataset for Gradient Inversion Attacks?

arXiv 2401.11748 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep gradient inversion attacks expose a serious threat to Federated Learning (FL) by accurately recovering private data from shared gradients. However, the state-of-the-art heavily relies on impractical assumptions to access excessive auxiliary data, which violates the basic data partitioning principle of FL. In this paper, a novel method, Gradient Inversion Attack using Practical Image Prior (GI-PIP), is proposed under a revised threat model. GI-PIP exploits anomaly detection models to capture the underlying distribution from fewer data, while GAN-based methods consume significant more data to synthesize images. The extracted distribution is then leveraged to regulate the attack process as Anomaly Score loss. Experimental results show that GI-PIP achieves a 16.12 dB PSNR recovery using only 3.8% data of ImageNet, while GAN-based methods necessitate over 70%. Moreover, GI-PIP exhibits superior capability on distribution generalization compared to GAN-based methods. Our approach significantly alleviates the auxiliary data requirement on both amount and distribution in gradient inversion attacks, hence posing more substantial threat to real-world FL.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.

Builds on

16 of 21 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  5. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  6. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  7. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  8. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  9. 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
  10. 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
  11. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  12. 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
4 more
  1. 2019Skip-GANomaly: Skip Connected and Adversarially Trained Encoder-Decoder Anomaly Detectioncited by 100
  2. 2022Auditing Privacy Defenses in Federated Learning via Generative Gradient Leakagecited by 72
  3. 2021Bayesian Framework for Gradient Leakagecited by 34
  4. 2022Learning to Invert: Simple Adaptive Attacks for Gradient Inversion in Federated Learningcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.