Natural Mitigation of Catastrophic Interference: Continual Learning in Power-Law Learning Environments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks often suffer from catastrophic interference (CI): performance on previously learned tasks drops off significantly when learning a new task. This contrasts strongly with humans, who can continually learn new tasks without appreciably forgetting previous tasks. Prior work has explored various techniques for mitigating CI and promoting continual learning such as regularization, rehearsal, generative replay, and context-specific components. This paper takes a different approach, one guided by cognitive science research showing that in naturalistic environments, the probability of encountering a task decreases as a power-law of the time since it was last performed. We argue that techniques for mitigating CI should be compared against the intrinsic mitigation in simulated naturalistic learning environments. Thus, we evaluate the extent of the natural mitigation of CI when training models in power-law environments, similar to those humans face. Our results show that natural rehearsal environments are better at mitigating CI than existing methods, calling for the need for better evaluation processes. The benefits of this environment include simplicity, rehearsal that is agnostic to both tasks and models, and the lack of a need for extra neural circuitry. In addition, we explore popular mitigation techniques in power-law environments to create new baselines for continual learning research.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 681
- 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 614
9 more
- 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 520
- 2017Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting by Incremental Moment Matchingcited by 243
- 2019REMIND Your Neural Network to Prevent Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 197
- 2017FearNet: Brain-Inspired Model for Incremental Learningcited by 177
- 2019Lifelong Machine Learning with Deep Streaming Linear Discriminant Analysiscited by 92
- 2022Continual Sequence Generation with Adaptive Compositional Modulescited by 31
- 2021Prototype-Guided Memory Replay for Continual Learningcited by 19
- 2019Sequential mastery of multiple visual tasks: Networks naturally learn to learn and forget to forgetcited by 13
- 2023Map-based Experience Replay: A Memory-Efficient Solution to Catastrophic Forgetting in Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.