mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Eclectic Rule Extraction for Explainability of Deep Neural Network based Intrusion Detection Systems

arXiv 2401.10207 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper addresses trust issues created from the ubiquity of black box algorithms and surrogate explainers in Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS). While Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) aims to enhance transparency, black box surrogate explainers, such as Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanation (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP), are difficult to trust. The black box nature of these surrogate explainers makes the process behind explanation generation opaque and difficult to understand. To avoid this problem, one can use transparent white box algorithms such as Rule Extraction (RE). There are three types of RE algorithms: pedagogical, decompositional, and eclectic. Pedagogical methods offer fast but untrustworthy white-box explanations, while decompositional RE provides trustworthy explanations with poor scalability. This work explores eclectic rule extraction, which strikes a balance between scalability and trustworthiness. By combining techniques from pedagogical and decompositional approaches, eclectic rule extraction leverages the advantages of both, while mitigating some of their drawbacks. The proposed Hybrid X-IDS architecture features eclectic RE as a white box surrogate explainer for black box Deep Neural Networks (DNN). The presented eclectic RE algorithm extracts human-readable rules from hidden layers, facilitating explainable and trustworthy rulesets. Evaluations on UNSW-NB15 and CIC-IDS-2017 datasets demonstrate the algorithm's ability to generate rulesets with 99.9% accuracy, mimicking DNN outputs. The contributions of this work include the hybrid X-IDS architecture, the eclectic rule extraction algorithm applicable to intrusion detection datasets, and a thorough analysis of performance and explainability, demonstrating the trade-offs involved in rule extraction speed and accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.

Builds on

8 of 29 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  4. 2022Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS): A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 25
  5. 2016Rule Extraction Algorithm for Deep Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 22
  6. 2021Efficient Decompositional Rule Extraction for Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  7. 2022Creating an Explainable Intrusion Detection System Using Self Organizing Mapscited by 6
  8. 2023Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems Using Competitive Learning Techniquescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.