Inductive Models for Artificial Intelligence Systems are Insufficient without Good Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper discusses the limitations of machine learning (ML), particularly deep artificial neural networks (ANNs), which are effective at approximating complex functions but often lack transparency and explanatory power. It highlights the `problem of induction' : the philosophical issue that past observations may not necessarily predict future events, a challenge that ML models face when encountering new, unseen data. The paper argues for the importance of not just making predictions but also providing good explanations, a feature that current models often fail to deliver. It suggests that for AI to progress, we must seek models that offer insights and explanations, not just predictions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2024.
Builds on
15 of 62 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 311
- 2017Schema Networks: Zero-shot Transfer with a Generative Causal Model of Intuitive Physicscited by 58
Built on by
Not cited yet.