The Power of Training: How Different Neural Network Setups Influence the Energy Demand
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work offers a heuristic evaluation of the effects of variations in machine learning training regimes and learning paradigms on the energy consumption of computing, especially HPC hardware with a life-cycle aware perspective. While increasing data availability and innovation in high-performance hardware fuels the training of sophisticated models, it also fosters the fading perception of energy consumption and carbon emission. Therefore, the goal of this work is to raise awareness about the energy impact of general training parameters and processes, from learning rate over batch size to knowledge transfer. Multiple setups with different hyperparameter configurations are evaluated on three different hardware systems. Among many results, we have found out that even with the same model and hardware to reach the same accuracy, improperly set training hyperparameters consume up to 5 times the energy of the optimal setup. We also extensively examined the energy-saving benefits of learning paradigms including recycling knowledge through pretraining and sharing knowledge through multitask training.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2024.
Builds on
13 of 27 references.
References · 13
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
- 2020On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practicecited by 181
- 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 168
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2020Hyper-Parameter Optimization: A Review of Algorithms and Applicationscited by 114
- 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
- 2017Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network for Pose-Invariant Face Recognitioncited by 24
- 2022Great Power, Great Responsibility: Recommendations for Reducing Energy for Training Language Modelscited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Small is Sufficient: Reducing the World AI Energy Consumption Through Model Selectioncited by 3
- 2026This Is Taking Too Long -- Investigating Time as a Proxy for Energy Consumption of LLMscited by 3
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunitiescited by 2
- 2024Multi-agent Assessment with QoS Enhancement for HD Map Updates in a Vehicular Networkcited by 1
- 2025Energy Consumption in Parallel Neural Network Trainingcited by 1
- 2024Leveraging Hybrid Intelligence Towards Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026Optimising for Energy Efficiency and Performance in Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026This Is Taking Too Long -- Investigating Time as a Proxy for Energy Consumption of LLMs16 Mar 2026
- 2026Optimising for Energy Efficiency and Performance in Machine Learning13 Jan 2026
- 2025Small is Sufficient: Reducing the World AI Energy Consumption Through Model Selection2 Oct 2025
- 2025Energy Consumption in Parallel Neural Network Training11 Aug 2025
- 2024Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunities13 Sep 2024
- 2024Multi-agent Assessment with QoS Enhancement for HD Map Updates in a Vehicular Network31 Jul 2024
- 2024Leveraging Hybrid Intelligence Towards Sustainable and Energy-Efficient Machine Learning15 Jul 2024