mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimising for Energy Efficiency and Performance in Machine Learning

arXiv 2601.08991 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ubiquity of machine learning (ML) and the demand for ever-larger models bring an increase in energy consumption and environmental impact. However, little is known about the energy scaling laws in ML, and existing research focuses on training cost -- ignoring the larger cost of inference. Furthermore, tools for measuring the energy consumption of ML do not provide actionable feedback. To address these gaps, we developed Energy Consumption Optimiser (ECOpt): a hyperparameter tuner that optimises for energy efficiency and model performance. ECOpt quantifies the trade-off between these metrics as an interpretable Pareto frontier. This enables ML practitioners to make informed decisions about energy cost and environmental impact, while maximising the benefit of their models and complying with new regulations. Using ECOpt, we show that parameter and floating-point operation counts can be unreliable proxies for energy consumption, and observe that the energy efficiency of Transformer models for text generation is relatively consistent across hardware. These findings motivate measuring and publishing the energy metrics of ML models. We further show that ECOpt can have a net positive environmental impact and use it to uncover seven models for CIFAR-10 that improve upon the state of the art, when considering accuracy and energy efficiency together.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2026.

Builds on

24 of 60 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  3. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,041
  4. 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 264
  5. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  6. 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 186
  7. 2021High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Sparse Axis-Aligned Subspacescited by 139
  8. 2021Parallel Bayesian Optimization of Multiple Noisy Objectives with Expected Hypervolume Improvementcited by 115
  9. 2024The rising costs of training frontier AI modelscited by 91
  10. 2022Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Trainingcited by 78
  11. 2020AutoML to Date and Beyond: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 63
  12. 2021Compute and Energy Consumption Trends in Deep Learning Inferencecited by 61
12 more
  1. 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
  2. 2023How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and reviewcited by 34
  3. 2023Reducing Energy Bloat in Large Model Trainingcited by 22
  4. 2024The Price of Prompting: Profiling Energy Use in Large Language Models Inferencecited by 22
  5. 2023On Optimal Caching and Model Multiplexing for Large Model Inferencecited by 20
  6. 2019Automatic Discovery of Privacy-Utility Pareto Frontscited by 16
  7. 2023Uncovering Energy-Efficient Practices in Deep Learning Training: Preliminary Steps Towards Green AIcited by 16
  8. 2021Latency-Aware Neural Architecture Search with Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 15
  9. 2023Part-time Power Measurements: nvidia-smi's Lack of Attentioncited by 15
  10. 2025Ground-Truthing AI Energy Consumption: Validating CodeCarbon Against External Measurementscited by 8
  11. 2024The Power of Training: How Different Neural Network Setups Influence the Energy Demandcited by 7
  12. 2023Reconciling High Accuracy, Cost-Efficiency, and Low Latency of Inference Serving Systemscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.