mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrating Edges into U-Net Models with Explainable Activation Maps for Brain Tumor Segmentation using MR Images

arXiv 2401.01303 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2024eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Manual delineation of tumor regions from magnetic resonance (MR) images is time-consuming, requires an expert, and is prone to human error. In recent years, deep learning models have been the go-to approach for the segmentation of brain tumors. U-Net and its' variants for semantic segmentation of medical images have achieved good results in the literature. However, U-Net and its' variants tend to over-segment tumor regions and may not accurately segment the tumor edges. The edges of the tumor are as important as the tumor regions for accurate diagnosis, surgical precision, and treatment planning. In the proposed work, the authors aim to extract edges from the ground truth using a derivative-like filter followed by edge reconstruction to obtain an edge ground truth in addition to the brain tumor ground truth. Utilizing both ground truths, the author studies several U-Net and its' variant architectures with and without tumor edges ground truth as a target along with the tumor ground truth for brain tumor segmentation. The author used the BraTS2020 benchmark dataset to perform the study and the results are tabulated for the dice and Hausdorff95 metrics. The mean and median metrics are calculated for the whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET) regions. Compared to the baseline U-Net and its variants, the models that learned edges along with the tumor regions performed well in core tumor regions in both training and validation datasets. The improved performance of edge-trained models trained on baseline models like U-Net and V-Net achieved performance similar to baseline state-of-the-art models like Swin U-Net and hybrid MR-U-Net. The edge-target trained models are capable of generating edge maps that can be useful for treatment planning. Additionally, for further explainability of the results, the activation map generated by the hybrid MR-U-Net has been studied.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2024.

Builds on

15 of 41 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  3. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  4. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  5. 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
  6. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  7. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 508
  8. 2020UNet 3+: A Full-Scale Connected UNet for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 331
  9. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 324
  10. 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
  11. 2015Brain Tumor Segmentation with Deep Neural Networkscited by 137
  12. 2018No New-Netcited by 61
3 more
  1. 2018Beyond One-hot Encoding: lower dimensional target embeddingcited by 42
  2. 2018Brain Tumor Segmentation using an Ensemble of 3D U-Nets and Overall Survival Prediction using Radiomic Featurescited by 33
  3. 20203D Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumor for Overall Survival Predictioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.