mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LEFL: Low Entropy Client Sampling in Federated Learning

arXiv 2312.17430 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning paradigm where multiple clients collaborate to optimize a single global model using their private data. The global model is maintained by a central server that orchestrates the FL training process through a series of training rounds. In each round, the server samples clients from a client pool before sending them its latest global model parameters for further optimization. Naive sampling strategies implement random client sampling and fail to factor client data distributions for privacy reasons. Hence we propose LEFL, an alternative sampling strategy by performing a one-time clustering of clients based on their model's learned high-level features while respecting data privacy. This enables the server to perform stratified client sampling across clusters in every round. We show datasets of sampled clients selected with this approach yield a low relative entropy with respect to the global data distribution. Consequently, the FL training becomes less noisy and significantly improves the convergence of the global model by as much as 7.4% in some experiments. Furthermore, it also significantly reduces the communication rounds required to achieve a target accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2023.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  6. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  7. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  8. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  9. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  10. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  11. 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
  12. 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
14 more
  1. 2019FedMD: Heterogenous Federated Learning via Model Distillationcited by 454
  2. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 415
  3. 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 196
  4. 2021Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated Learningcited by 93
  5. 2021Tackling System and Statistical Heterogeneity for Federated Learning with Adaptive Client Samplingcited by 66
  6. 2019Astraea: Self-balancing Federated Learning for Improving Classification Accuracy of Mobile Deep Learning Applicationscited by 64
  7. 2019Active Federated Learningcited by 63
  8. 2020Ternary Compression for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 57
  9. 2020Federated learning with class imbalance reductioncited by 52
  10. 2020Federated Knowledge Distillationcited by 51
  11. 2022Fed-CBS: A Heterogeneity-Aware Client Sampling Mechanism for Federated Learning via Class-Imbalance Reductioncited by 32
  12. 2021Curse or Redemption? How Data Heterogeneity Affects the Robustness of Federated Learningcited by 21
  13. 2020Optimal Importance Sampling for Federated Learningcited by 20
  14. 2021SPATL: Salient Parameter Aggregation and Transfer Learning for Heterogeneous Clients in Federated Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.