Exploring data augmentation in bias mitigation against non-native-accented speech
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) should serve every speaker, not only the majority ``standard'' speakers of a language. In order to build inclusive ASR, mitigating the bias against speaker groups who speak in a ``non-standard'' or ``diverse'' way is crucial. We aim to mitigate the bias against non-native-accented Flemish in a Flemish ASR system. Since this is a low-resource problem, we investigate the optimal type of data augmentation, i.e., speed/pitch perturbation, cross-lingual voice conversion-based methods, and SpecAugment, applied to both native Flemish and non-native-accented Flemish, for bias mitigation. The results showed that specific types of data augmentation applied to both native and non-native-accented speech improve non-native-accented ASR while applying data augmentation to the non-native-accented speech is more conducive to bias reduction. Combining both gave the largest bias reduction for human-machine interaction (HMI) as well as read-type speech.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024A Contrastive Learning Approach to Mitigate Bias in Speech Modelscited by 9
- 2024Improving child speech recognition with augmented child-like speechcited by 7
- 2025Towards Inclusive ASR: Investigating Voice Conversion for Dysarthric Speech Recognition in Low-Resource Languagescited by 3
- 2025EMO-Debias: Benchmarking Gender Debiasing Techniques in Multi-Label Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 3
- 2025How to Evaluate Automatic Speech Recognition: Comparing Different Performance and Bias Measurescited by 3
- 2025Effects of Speaker Count, Duration, and Accent Diversity on Zero-Shot Accent Robustness in Low-Resource ASRcited by 2
- 2025CO-VADA: A Confidence-Oriented Voice Augmentation Debiasing Approach for Fair Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 1
- 2025Fairness in Dysarthric Speech Synthesis: Understanding Intrinsic Bias in Dysarthric Speech Cloning using F5-TTScited by 1
- 2026"OK Aura, Be Fair With Me": Demographics-Agnostic Training for Bias Mitigation in Wake-up Word Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Bias in Phoneme-Based Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: An Analysis of IPA Transcription Modelscited by 0
- 2026Comparing Human and Automatic Recognition of Dutch Dysarthric Continuous Speech: A Case Studycited by 0
- 2026Comparing Human and Automatic Recognition of Dutch Dysarthric Continuous Speech: A Case Study29 Jun 2026
- 2026Evaluating Bias in Phoneme-Based Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: An Analysis of IPA Transcription Models10 Jun 2026
- 2026"OK Aura, Be Fair With Me": Demographics-Agnostic Training for Bias Mitigation in Wake-up Word Detection7 Apr 2026
- 2025Fairness in Dysarthric Speech Synthesis: Understanding Intrinsic Bias in Dysarthric Speech Cloning using F5-TTS7 Aug 2025
- 2025How to Evaluate Automatic Speech Recognition: Comparing Different Performance and Bias Measures8 Jul 2025
- 2025CO-VADA: A Confidence-Oriented Voice Augmentation Debiasing Approach for Fair Speech Emotion Recognition6 Jun 2025
- 2025EMO-Debias: Benchmarking Gender Debiasing Techniques in Multi-Label Speech Emotion Recognition5 Jun 2025
- 2025Effects of Speaker Count, Duration, and Accent Diversity on Zero-Shot Accent Robustness in Low-Resource ASR4 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Inclusive ASR: Investigating Voice Conversion for Dysarthric Speech Recognition in Low-Resource Languages20 May 2025
- 2024A Contrastive Learning Approach to Mitigate Bias in Speech Models20 Jun 2024
- 2024Improving child speech recognition with augmented child-like speech12 Jun 2024