How to Evaluate Automatic Speech Recognition: Comparing Different Performance and Bias Measures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is increasingly more evidence that automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are biased against different speakers and speaker groups, e.g., due to gender, age, or accent. Research on bias in ASR has so far primarily focused on detecting and quantifying bias, and developing mitigation approaches. Despite this progress, the open question is how to measure the performance and bias of a system. In this study, we compare different performance and bias measures, from literature and proposed, to evaluate state-of-the-art end-to-end ASR systems for Dutch. Our experiments use several bias mitigation strategies to address bias against different speaker groups. The findings reveal that averaged error rates, a standard in ASR research, alone is not sufficient and should be supplemented by other measures. The paper ends with recommendations for reporting ASR performance and bias to better represent a system's performance for diverse speaker groups, and overall system bias.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2025.
Builds on
13 of 39 references.
References · 13
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,863
- 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
- 2018ESPnet: End-to-End Speech Processing Toolkitcited by 558
- 2023A Review of Deep Learning Techniques for Speech Processingcited by 52
- 2022Toward Fairness in Speech Recognition: Discovery and mitigation of performance disparitiescited by 28
- 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in Speech Recognition: Casual Conversations Dataset Transcriptionscited by 26
- 2019Gender Representation in French Broadcast Corpora and Its Impact on ASR Performancecited by 23
- 2022De-biasing "bias" measurementcited by 20
- 2021Model-Based Approach for Measuring the Fairness in ASRcited by 13
- 2023Exploring data augmentation in bias mitigation against non-native-accented speechcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025IndicVisionBench: Benchmarking Cultural and Multilingual Understanding in VLMscited by 8
- 2026VIBE: Voice-Induced open-ended Bias Evaluation for Large Audio-Language Models via Real-World Speechcited by 3
- 2026Beyond Word Error Rate: Auditing the Diversity Tax in Speech Recognition through Dataset Cartographycited by 1
- 2026VIBE: Voice-Induced open-ended Bias Evaluation for Large Audio-Language Models via Real-World Speech19 Apr 2026
- 2026Beyond Word Error Rate: Auditing the Diversity Tax in Speech Recognition through Dataset Cartography5 Mar 2026
- 2025IndicVisionBench: Benchmarking Cultural and Multilingual Understanding in VLMs6 Nov 2025