mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Bias in Phoneme-Based Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: An Analysis of IPA Transcription Models

arXiv 2606.11639 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems shift toward multilingual support and low-resource language modeling, phoneme-based layers serve as a critical language-agnostic foundation. However, most evaluations of ASR's demographic biases related to race, age, gender, and accent focus on standard grapheme-based ASR systems with comparatively little emphasis on phoneme-based systems. In this study, we evaluate the performance of WhisperIPA and ZIPA, two state-of-the-art open-source systems that generate International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) transcriptions. Our evaluation includes existing multilingual speech corpora and demographically annotated English-language corpora, comparing model-generated IPA transcriptions against grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) systems using both standard phoneme error rate (PER) and a proposed Soft PER metric that tolerates linguistically similar phoneme substitutions. Our analysis examines how performance varies across language, gender, accent, ethnicity, and age, revealing persistent disparities even after accounting for acceptable phonemic variation. These findings, while limited, provide insight into potential sources of bias and inform the development of more inclusive and linguistically robust phoneme-based ASR systems. Our code and data are publicly available.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

22 of 51 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  2. 2021XLS-R: Self-supervised Cross-lingual Speech Representation Learning at Scalecited by 589
  3. 2020Universal Phone Recognition with a Multilingual Allophone Systemcited by 81
  4. 2021Simple and Effective Zero-shot Cross-lingual Phoneme Recognitioncited by 79
  5. 2021Quantifying Bias in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 50
  6. 2023The Edinburgh International Accents of English Corpus: Towards the Democratization of English ASRcited by 36
  7. 2025ZIPA: A family of efficient models for multilingual phone recognitioncited by 18
  8. 2021MediaSpeech: Multilanguage ASR Benchmark and Datasetcited by 17
  9. 2023The taste of IPA: Towards open-vocabulary keyword spotting and forced alignment in any languagecited by 14
  10. 2024Anatomy of Industrial Scale Multilingual ASRcited by 14
  11. 2023Exploring data augmentation in bias mitigation against non-native-accented speechcited by 11
  12. 2020AlloVera: A Multilingual Allophone Databasecited by 10
10 more
  1. 2026WAXAL: A Large-Scale Multilingual African Language Speech Corpuscited by 10
  2. 2025Dolphin: A Large-Scale Automatic Speech Recognition Model for Eastern Languagescited by 8
  3. 2024Sonos Voice Control Bias Assessment Dataset: A Methodology for Demographic Bias Assessment in Voice Assistantscited by 6
  4. 2025Adapting Whisper for Regional Dialects: Enhancing Public Services for Vulnerable Populations in the United Kingdomcited by 6
  5. 2025IPA-CHILDES & G2P+: Feature-Rich Resources for Cross-Lingual Phonology and Phonemic Language Modelingcited by 6
  6. 2025Automatic Speech Recognition Biases in Newcastle English: an Error Analysiscited by 6
  7. 2025Toward Responsible ASR for African American English Speakers: A Scoping Review of Bias and Equity in Speech Technologycited by 2
  8. 2026Advanced Modeling of Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit with L1-L2 Multi-Task Learning Using Differentiable K-Means for Accent-Robust Discrete Token-Based ASRcited by 2
  9. 2025Linguistically Informed Tokenization Improves ASR for Underresourced Languagescited by 1
  10. 2025A Sociophonetic Analysis of Racial Bias in Commercial ASR Systems Using the Pacific Northwest English Corpuscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.