mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

arXiv 2312.14436 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2023cs.RO cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

The effectiveness of reinforcement learning (RL) agents in continuous control robotics tasks is mainly dependent on the design of the underlying reward function, which is highly prone to reward hacking. A misalignment between the reward function and underlying human preferences (values, social norms) can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world especially in the context of robotics for critical decision making. Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences and subsequently performing policy optimization. However, these methods inadvertently introduce a distribution shift during reward learning due to ignoring the dependence of agent-generated trajectories on the reward learning objective, ultimately resulting in sub-optimal alignment. Hence, in this work, we address this challenge by advocating for the adoption of regularized reward functions that more accurately mirror the intended behaviors of the agent. We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF (RL from Human Feedback) framework, which we refer to as agent preferences. Our approach uniquely incorporates not just human feedback in the form of preferences but also considers the preferences of the RL agent itself during the reward function learning process. This dual consideration significantly mitigates the issue of distribution shift in RLHF with a computationally tractable algorithm. We provide a theoretical justification for the proposed algorithm by formulating the robotic RLHF problem as a bilevel optimization problem and developing a computationally tractable version of the same. We demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm ours in several continuous control benchmarks in DeepMind Control Suite citetassa2018deepmind.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback3 Aug
  2. 2022SURF: Semi-supervised Reward Learning with Data Augmentation for Feedback-efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning18 Mar
  3. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 12

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  3. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  4. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
  5. 2019Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationscited by 256
  6. 2022Defining and Characterizing Reward Hackingcited by 184
  7. 2017Parameter Space Noise for Explorationcited by 158
  8. 2022BOME! Bilevel Optimization Made Easy: A Simple First-Order Approachcited by 103
  9. 2021Reward (Mis)design for Autonomous Drivingcited by 102
  10. 2022The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 82
  11. 2022Regret Bounds for Information-Directed Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  12. 2023STEERING: Stein Information Directed Exploration for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025VARP: Reinforcement Learning from Vision-Language Model Feedback with Agent Regularized Preferences
  2. 2025Repairing Reward Functions with Feedback to Mitigate Reward Hacking
  3. 2022Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learning
  5. 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function
  6. 2025Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?
  7. 2025Residual Reward Models: Leveraging Prior Knowledge for Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  8. 2024Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment