ShuttleSHAP: A Turn-Based Feature Attribution Approach for Analyzing Forecasting Models in Badminton
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Agent forecasting systems have been explored to investigate agent patterns and improve decision-making in various domains, e.g., pedestrian predictions and marketing bidding. Badminton represents a fascinating example of a multifaceted turn-based sport, requiring both sophisticated tactic developments and alternate-dependent decision-making. Recent deep learning approaches for player tactic forecasting in badminton show promising performance partially attributed to effective reasoning about rally-player interactions. However, a critical obstacle lies in the unclear functionality of which features are learned for simulating players' behaviors by black-box models, where existing explainers are not equipped with turn-based and multi-output attributions. To bridge this gap, we propose a turn-based feature attribution approach, ShuttleSHAP, for analyzing forecasting models in badminton based on variants of Shapley values. ShuttleSHAP is a model-agnostic explainer that aims to quantify contribution by not only temporal aspects but also player aspects in terms of multifaceted cues. Incorporating the proposed analysis tool into the state-of-the-art turn-based forecasting model on the benchmark dataset reveals that it is, in fact, insignificant to reason about past strokes, while conventional sequential models have greater impacts. Instead, players' styles influence the models for the future simulation of a rally. On top of that, we investigate and discuss the causal analysis of these findings and demonstrate the practicability with local analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.
Builds on
23 of 37 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
- 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 224
- 2020Transformer Networks for Trajectory Forecastingcited by 181
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
- 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
- 2018Pathologies of Neural Models Make Interpretations Difficultcited by 140
- 2019Explaining Deep Neural Networks with a Polynomial Time Algorithm for Shapley Values Approximationcited by 115
11 more
- 2023EqMotion: Equivariant Multi-agent Motion Prediction with Invariant Interaction Reasoningcited by 97
- 2020TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbationscited by 74
- 2022MonoTrack: Shuttle trajectory reconstruction from monocular badminton videocited by 24
- 2021You Mostly Walk Alone: Analyzing Feature Attribution in Trajectory Predictioncited by 23
- 2021ShuttleNet: Position-aware Fusion of Rally Progress and Player Styles for Stroke Forecasting in Badmintoncited by 21
- 2020Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analyticscited by 12
- 2021Exploring the Long Short-Term Dependencies to Infer Shot Influence in Badminton Matchescited by 10
- 2022Where Will Players Move Next? Dynamic Graphs and Hierarchical Fusion for Movement Forecasting in Badmintoncited by 10
- 2023Benchmarking Stroke Forecasting with Stroke-Level Badminton Datasetcited by 8
- 2023Real-time simulation of viscoelastic tissue behavior with physics-guided deep learningcited by 6
- 2022A Reinforcement Learning Badminton Environment for Simulating Player Tactics (Student Abstract)cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.