Rethinking Robustness of Model Attributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For machine learning models to be reliable and trustworthy, their decisions must be interpretable. As these models find increasing use in safety-critical applications, it is important that not just the model predictions but also their explanations (as feature attributions) be robust to small human-imperceptible input perturbations. Recent works have shown that many attribution methods are fragile and have proposed improvements in either these methods or the model training. We observe two main causes for fragile attributions: first, the existing metrics of robustness (e.g., top-k intersection) over-penalize even reasonable local shifts in attribution, thereby making random perturbations to appear as a strong attack, and second, the attribution can be concentrated in a small region even when there are multiple important parts in an image. To rectify this, we propose simple ways to strengthen existing metrics and attribution methods that incorporate locality of pixels in robustness metrics and diversity of pixel locations in attributions. Towards the role of model training in attributional robustness, we empirically observe that adversarially trained models have more robust attributions on smaller datasets, however, this advantage disappears in larger datasets. Code is available at https://github.com/ksandeshk/LENS.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2023.
Builds on
38 of 55 references.
References · 38
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
26 more
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
- 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
- 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
- 2020On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 88
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Deep Learning Adversarial Robustness: A Surveycited by 72
- 2019Robust Attribution Regularizationcited by 47
- 2020Robust and Stable Black Box Explanationscited by 47
- 2020Smoothed Geometry for Robust Attributioncited by 38
- 2020Data Valuation for Medical Imaging Using Shapley Value: Application on A Large-scale Chest X-ray Datasetcited by 34
- 2020Assessing the (Un)Trustworthiness of Saliency Maps for Localizing Abnormalities in Medical Imagingcited by 32
- 2021Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Materials Science and Chemistrycited by 26
- 2020Enhanced Regularizers for Attributional Robustnesscited by 12
- 2022How explainable are adversarially-robust CNNs?cited by 9
- 2022Exploiting the Relationship Between Kendall's Rank Correlation and Cosine Similarity for Attribution Protectioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.