mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Greedy Shapley Client Selection for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning

arXiv 2312.09108 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.DCcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard client selection algorithms for Federated Learning (FL) are often unbiased and involve uniform random sampling of clients. This has been proven sub-optimal for fast convergence under practical settings characterized by significant heterogeneity in data distribution, computing, and communication resources across clients. For applications having timing constraints due to limited communication opportunities with the parameter server (PS), the client selection strategy is critical to complete model training within the fixed budget of communication rounds. To address this, we develop a biased client selection strategy, GreedyFed, that identifies and greedily selects the most contributing clients in each communication round. This method builds on a fast approximation algorithm for the Shapley Value at the PS, making the computation tractable for real-world applications with many clients. Compared to various client selection strategies on several real-world datasets, GreedyFed demonstrates fast and stable convergence with high accuracy under timing constraints and when imposing a higher degree of heterogeneity in data distribution, systems constraints, and privacy requirements.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  5. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  6. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  7. 2018Sparsified SGD with Memorycited by 376
  8. 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 301
  9. 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
  10. 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
  11. 2019Measure Contribution of Participants in Federated Learningcited by 79
  12. 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 74
4 more
  1. 2021Game of Gradients: Mitigating Irrelevant Clients in Federated Learningcited by 35
  2. 2020Optimal Importance Sampling for Federated Learningcited by 20
  3. 2021Is Shapley Value fair? Improving Client Selection for Mavericks in Federated Learningcited by 7
  4. 2023Goal-Oriented Communications in Federated Learning via Feedback on Risk-Averse Participationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

7 papers.