FairEquityFL -- A Fair and Equitable Client Selection in Federated Learning for Heterogeneous IoV Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has been extensively employed for a number of applications in machine learning, i.e., primarily owing to its privacy preserving nature and efficiency in mitigating the communication overhead. Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is one of the promising applications, wherein FL can be utilized to train a model more efficiently. Since only a subset of the clients can participate in each FL training round, challenges arise pertinent to fairness in the client selection process. Over the years, a number of researchers from both academia and industry have proposed numerous FL frameworks. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of them have employed fairness for FL-based client selection in a dynamic and heterogeneous IoV environment. Accordingly, in this paper, we envisage a FairEquityFL framework to ensure an equitable opportunity for all the clients to participate in the FL training process. In particular, we have introduced a sampling equalizer module within the selector component for ensuring fairness in terms of fair collaboration opportunity for all the clients in the client selection process. The selector is additionally responsible for both monitoring and controlling the clients' participation in each FL training round. Moreover, an outlier detection mechanism is enforced for identifying malicious clients based on the model performance in terms of considerable fluctuation in either accuracy or loss minimization. The selector flags suspicious clients and temporarily suspend such clients from participating in the FL training process. We further evaluate the performance of FairEquityFL on a publicly available dataset, FEMNIST. Our simulation results depict that FairEquityFL outperforms baseline models to a considerable extent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.
Builds on
13 of 29 references.
References · 13
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 118
- 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 88
- 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 68
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2021Towards Fairness-Aware Federated Learningcited by 58
- 2020Stochastic Client Selection for Federated Learning with Volatile Clientscited by 39
- 2021Applications of Federated Learning in Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Challengescited by 17
- 2023Fairness-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learningcited by 15
- 2022A Survey on Participant Selection for Federated Learning in Mobile Networkscited by 11
- 2023Greedy Shapley Client Selection for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 7
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey On Client Selections in Federated Learningcited by 6
1 more
- 2022E2FL: Equal and Equitable Federated Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.