mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CIDR: A Cooperative Integrated Dynamic Refining Method for Minimal Feature Removal Problem

arXiv 2312.08157 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The minimal feature removal problem in the post-hoc explanation area aims to identify the minimal feature set (MFS). Prior studies using the greedy algorithm to calculate the minimal feature set lack the exploration of feature interactions under a monotonic assumption which cannot be satisfied in general scenarios. In order to address the above limitations, we propose a Cooperative Integrated Dynamic Refining method (CIDR) to efficiently discover minimal feature sets. Specifically, we design Cooperative Integrated Gradients (CIG) to detect interactions between features. By incorporating CIG and characteristics of the minimal feature set, we transform the minimal feature removal problem into a knapsack problem. Additionally, we devise an auxiliary Minimal Feature Refinement algorithm to determine the minimal feature set from numerous candidate sets. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to address the minimal feature removal problem in the field of natural language processing. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CIDR is capable of tracing representative minimal feature sets with improved interpretability across various models and datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2023.

Builds on

26 of 34 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  9. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  10. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  11. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  12. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
14 more
  1. 2015Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLPcited by 199
  2. 2020Self-Attention Attribution: Interpreting Information Interactions Inside Transformercited by 124
  3. 2017Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttributioncited by 84
  4. 2020How does this interaction affect me? Interpretable attribution for feature interactionscited by 73
  5. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  6. 2018Hierarchical interpretations for neural network predictionscited by 66
  7. 2020Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification via Feature Interaction Detectioncited by 57
  8. 2021Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language Modelscited by 45
  9. 2021Shapley Explanation Networkscited by 41
  10. 2020Learning Variational Word Masks to Improve the Interpretability of Neural Text Classifierscited by 35
  11. 2020Investigating Saturation Effects in Integrated Gradientscited by 22
  12. 2022Cardinality-Minimal Explanations for Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 8
  13. 2023Improving Interpretability via Explicit Word Interaction Graph Layercited by 6
  14. 2018Explaining Character-Aware Neural Networks for Word-Level Prediction: Do They Discover Linguistic Rules?cited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.