Bayesian Online Learning for Consensus Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a pre-trained classifier and multiple human experts, we investigate the task of online classification where model predictions are provided for free but querying humans incurs a cost. In this practical but under-explored setting, oracle ground truth is not available. Instead, the prediction target is defined as the consensus vote of all experts. Given that querying full consensus can be costly, we propose a general framework for online Bayesian consensus estimation, leveraging properties of the multivariate hypergeometric distribution. Based on this framework, we propose a family of methods that dynamically estimate expert consensus from partial feedback by producing a posterior over expert and model beliefs. Analyzing this posterior induces an interpretable trade-off between querying cost and classification performance. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework against a variety of baselines on CIFAR-10H and ImageNet-16H, two large-scale crowdsourced datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2023.
Builds on
11 of 31 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 262
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2022Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifierscited by 68
- 2021Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and Calibrationcited by 40
- 2019Ask Not What AI Can Do, But What AI Should Do: Towards a Framework of Task Delegabilitycited by 36
- 2020Online Active Model Selection for Pre-trained Classifierscited by 19
- 2023Evaluating AI systems under uncertain ground truth: a case study in dermatologycited by 7
- 2023Online Decision Mediationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Bayesian Inference for Correlated Human Experts and Classifierscited by 1
- 2026Human-AI Teaming Through the Lens of Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026Human-AI Teaming Through the Lens of Calibration9 Jun 2026
- 2025Bayesian Inference for Correlated Human Experts and Classifiers5 Jun 2025