mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Filter & Align: Leveraging Human Knowledge to Curate Image-Text Data

arXiv 2312.06726 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing availability of image-text pairs has largely fueled the rapid advancement in vision-language foundation models. However, the vast scale of these datasets inevitably introduces significant variability in data quality, which can adversely affect the model performance. This highlights the critical role of data filtering, not only to enhance training efficiency but also to improve overall data quality. Existing methods typically rely on metrics such as CLIP Score and BLIP Score, which are derived from pre-trained models. However, these models are often trained on uncurated, noisy datasets, which can perpetuate errors and misalignments in the filtered dataset. We present a novel algorithm that incorporates human knowledge on image-text alignment to guide filtering vast corpus of web-crawled image-text datasets into a compact and high-quality form. To systemically capture human preferences on image-text alignments, we collect a diverse image-text dataset where each image is associated with multiple captions from various sources, and establish a comprehensive set of both subjective and objective criteria for critically guiding the alignment assessment from labelers. Additionally, we train a reward model on these human-preference annotations to internalize the nuanced human understanding of image-text alignment. The resulting reward model thus can act as a human-like referee to filter image-text pairs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that we can maintain, sometimes even improve, model performance while compressing the image-text datasets up to ~90%. An impressive example is that, by aggressively reducing the total training sample from 130M to only 15.5M, our BLIP-B/16 models consistently show an average improvement of 2.9% on retrieval tasks and 11.5% on captioning tasks compared to full-size-dataset counterparts.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.

Builds on

31 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning11 May

Other references · 30

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  7. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  10. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  11. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  12. 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,300
18 more
  1. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  2. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  3. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,745
  4. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
  5. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,216
  6. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
  7. 2023Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedbackcited by 422
  8. 2021Combined Scaling for Zero-shot Transfer Learningcited by 182
  9. 2023HIVE: Harnessing Human Feedback for Instructional Visual Editingcited by 173
  10. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 159
  11. 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 158
  12. 2018Can Neural Machine Translation be Improved with User Feedback?cited by 72
  13. 2023Toward Verifiable and Reproducible Human Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 68
  14. 2022Accelerating Dataset Distillation via Model Augmentationcited by 62
  15. 2020Learning to Compare for Better Training and Evaluation of Open Domain Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 28
  16. 2023CiT: Curation in Training for Effective Vision-Language Datacited by 27
  17. 2023Too Large; Data Reduction for Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 26
  18. 2022Adversarial Examples for Good: Adversarial Examples Guided Imbalanced Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Removing Distributional Discrepancies in Captions Improves Image-Text Alignment
  2. 2024Improving Long-Text Alignment for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  3. 2025Align Beyond Prompts: Evaluating World Knowledge Alignment in Text-to-Image Generation
  4. 2023What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluation
  5. 2025Cycle Consistency as Reward: Learning Image-Text Alignment without Human Preferences
  6. 2023Mismatch Quest: Visual and Textual Feedback for Image-Text Misalignment
  7. 2025YINYANG-ALIGN: Benchmarking Contradictory Objectives and Proposing Multi-Objective Optimization based DPO for Text-to-Image Alignment
  8. 2023Divide, Evaluate, and Refine: Evaluating and Improving Text-to-Image Alignment with Iterative VQA Feedback